Literature DB >> 18246388

The effect of surgical subspecialization on outcomes in peptic ulcer disease complicated by perforation and bleeding.

Andrew J Robson1, Jennifer M J Richards, Nicholas Ohly, Stephen J Nixon, Simon Paterson-Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgical services in Edinburgh were restructured in July 2002 to deliver subspecialist management of colorectal and upper-gastrointestinal emergencies on separate sites. The effect of emergency subspecialization on outcome from perforated and bleeding peptic ulceration was assessed.
METHODS: All patients admitted with complicated peptic ulceration (January 2000-February 2005) were identified from a prospectively compiled database.
RESULTS: Perforation: 148 patients were admitted with perforation before the service reorganization (period A - 31 months) of whom 126 (85.1%) underwent surgery; 135 patients were admitted in period B (31 months) of whom 114 (84.4%) were managed operatively. The in-hospital mortality was lower in period B (14/135, 10.4%) than period A (30/148, 20.3%; P = 0.023; relative risk (RR), 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.91). There was a significantly higher rate of gastric resection in the second half of the study (period A 1/126 vs. period B 8/114; P = 0.015; RR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.48-54.34). Length of hospital stay was similar for both groups. Bleeding: 51 patients underwent operative management of bleeding peptic ulceration in period A and 51 in period B. There were no differences in length of stay or mortality between these two groups.
CONCLUSION: Restructuring of surgical services with emergency subspecialization was associated with lower mortality for perforated peptic ulceration. Subspecialist experience, intraoperative decision-making, and improved postoperative care have all contributed to this improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246388     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9444-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for peptic ulcer today. A study on the incidence, methods and mortality in surgery for peptic ulcer in Finland between 1987 and 1999.

Authors:  H Paimela; N K J Oksala; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  30-day mortality after peptic ulcer perforation among users of newer selective COX-2 inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs: a population-based study.

Authors:  Reimar W Thomsen; Anders Riis; Estrid M Munk; Mette Nørgaard; Steffen Christensen; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  The influence of surgical specialty training on the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  J V Tu; P C Austin; K W Johnston
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Management variability in surgery for colorectal emergencies.

Authors:  C R Darby; A R Berry; N Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Declining incidence of peptic ulcer but not of its complications: a nation-wide study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P N Post; E J Kuipers; G A Meijer
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers.

Authors:  J Y Lau; J J Sung; Y H Lam; A C Chan; E K Ng; D W Lee; F K Chan; R C Suen; S C Chung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Robert J Myerson; James W Fleshman; Robert D Fry; Elisa H Birnbaum; Bruce J Walz; Ira J Kodner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Carlos Noguiera; António Sérgio Silva; Jorge Nunes Santos; António Gomes Silva; Joaquim Ferreira; Eduarda Matos; Hernani Vilaça
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Epidemiology of duodenal ulcer perforation: a study on hospital admissions in Norfolk, United Kingdom.

Authors:  D S Canoy; A R Hart; C J Todd
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.088

10.  Comparison of transcatheter arterial embolization and surgery for treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer after endoscopic treatment failure.

Authors:  Cristina Ripoll; Rafael Bañares; Inmaculada Beceiro; Pedro Menchén; María-Vega Catalina; Antonio Echenagusia; Fernando Turegano
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Surgical intervention in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding].

Authors:  R Czymek; A Grossmann; U Roblick; T Jungbluth; F Fischer; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: Has Anything Changed?

Authors:  Selja Koskensalo; Ari Leppäniemi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit.

Authors:  Anne Nakano; Jørgen Bendix; Sven Adamsen; Daniel Buck; Jan Mainz; Paul Bartels; Bente Nørgård
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11-30

4.  Sengstaken-Blakemore tube for non-variceal distal esophageal bleeding refractory to endoscopic treatment: a case report & review of the literature.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Alastair P Dorreen; Paul J Warshawsky; Jonathan M Wyse
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-04-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.