Literature DB >> 18246351

Cytotoxic effects of treosulfan and busulfan against leukemic cells of pediatric patients.

Doreen Munkelt1, Ulrike Koehl, Stephan Kloess, Stefanie-Yvonne Zimmermann, Rabiá El Kalaäoui, Sibylle Wehner, Dirk Schwabe, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Ralf Schubert, Joerg Kreuter, Thomas Klingebiel, Ruth Esser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The alkylating agent treosulfan exerts a high cytotoxic activity against various malignant cells. Due to limited non-hematological toxicity, treosulfan might be a promising compound in myeloablative therapy for hematopoietic transplantation in children. Since in vitro data regarding the activity of treosulfan against childhood leukemic cells are limited, we compared the effect of treosulfan and busulfan against pediatric leukemic and non-malignant cells. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Both agents were tested alone and in combination with fludarabine by means of the MTT and/or a five color-flow cytometric assay. Moreover, the induction of apoptosis by treosulfan was investigated via regulation of the proteinase caspase 3.
RESULTS: Treosulfan was more active against leukemic cells of 20 children as well as against 3 leukemia-derived cell lines than busulfan, with increasing IC50 values from initial diagnosis to relapse. Overall purified stem cells were most sensitive, followed by CD56+CD3- NK and CD3+ T cells. The combination of treosulfan with fludarabine resulted in a synergistic effect against leukemic cells. In malignant cells, treosulfan induced rapid cell apoptosis measured by the activation of the centrally proteinase caspase 3.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that treosulfan has activity against pediatric leukemic cells, myeloablative potential and immunosuppressive properties suitable for conditioning regimen in childhood malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246351     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-007-0669-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  Toxicological effects of fludarabine and treosulfan conditioning before allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Mats Remberger; Johan Törlen; Ibrahim El Serafi; Karin Garming-Legert; Andreas Björklund; Per Ljungman; Mikael Sundin; Moustapha Hassan; Jonas Mattsson
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Eneida R Nemecek; Katherine A Guthrie; Mohamed L Sorror; Brent L Wood; Kristine C Doney; Ralf A Hilger; Bart L Scott; Tibor J Kovacsovics; Richard T Maziarz; Ann E Woolfrey; Antonio Bedalov; Jean E Sanders; John M Pagel; Eileen J Sickle; Robert Witherspoon; Mary E Flowers; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Treosulfan-based conditioning is feasible and effective for cord blood recipients: a phase 2 multicenter study.

Authors:  Filippo Milano; Jonathan A Gutman; H Joachim Deeg; Eneida R Nemecek; Joachim Baumgart; Laurel Thur; Ann Dahlberg; Rachel B Salit; Corinne Summers; Frederick R Appelbaum; Colleen Delaney
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-07-28

4.  Fludarabine and treosulfan compared with other reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  R Yerushalmi; N Shem-Tov; I Danylesko; A Avigdor; A Nagler; A Shimoni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Proposed Therapeutic Range of Treosulfan in Reduced Toxicity Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Conditioning: Results From a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Robert Chiesa; Joseph F Standing; Robert Winter; Zohreh Nademi; Jan Chu; Danielle Pinner; Frank Kloprogge; Susan McLellen; Persis J Amrolia; Kanchan Rao; Giovanna Lucchini; Juliana Silva; Oana Ciocarlie; Arina Lazareva; Andrew R Gennery; Bilyana Doncheva; Andrew J Cant; Sophie Hambleton; Terence Flood; Elizabeth Rogerson; Kirsty Devine; Helen Prunty; Simon Heales; Paul Veys; Mary Slatter
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Enhanced Cellular Uptake and Photodynamic Effect with Amphiphilic Fluorinated Porphyrins: The Role of Sulfoester Groups and the Nature of Reactive Oxygen Species.

Authors:  Barbara Pucelik; Adam Sułek; Agnieszka Drozd; Grażyna Stochel; Mariette M Pereira; Sara M A Pinto; Luis G Arnaut; Janusz M Dąbrowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Long-Term Outcomes of Treosulfan- vs. Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Zhu; Gang Liu; Jing Liu; Qiuying Chen; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Samantha O'Hagan Henderson; Jochen J Frietsch; Inken Hilgendorf; Andreas Hochhaus; Claus-Henning Köhne; Jochen Casper
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.322

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.