Literature DB >> 18245477

Sixteen-kinase gene expression identifies luminal breast cancers with poor prognosis.

Pascal Finetti1, Nathalie Cervera, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Christian Chabannon, Colette Charpin, Max Chaffanet, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Patrice Viens, Daniel Birnbaum, François Bertucci.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease made of various molecular subtypes with different prognosis. However, evolution remains difficult to predict within some subtypes, such as luminal A, and treatment is not as adapted as it should be. Refinement of prognostic classification and identification of new therapeutic targets are needed. Using oligonucleotide microarrays, we profiled 227 breast cancers. We focused our analysis on two major breast cancer subtypes with opposite prognosis, luminal A (n = 80) and basal (n = 58), and on genes encoding protein kinases. Whole-kinome expression separated luminal A and basal tumors. The expression (measured by a kinase score) of 16 genes encoding serine/threonine kinases involved in mitosis distinguished two subgroups of luminal A tumors: Aa, of good prognosis and Ab, of poor prognosis. This classification and its prognostic effect were validated in 276 luminal A cases from three independent series profiled across different microarray platforms. The classification outperformed the current prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analyses in both training and validation sets. The luminal Ab subgroup, characterized by high mitotic activity compared with luminal Aa tumors, displayed clinical characteristics and a kinase score intermediate between the luminal Aa subgroup and the luminal B subtype, suggesting a continuum in luminal tumors. Some of the mitotic kinases of the signature represent therapeutic targets under investigation. The identification of luminal A cases of poor prognosis should help select appropriate treatment, whereas the identification of a relevant kinase set provides potential targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18245477     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  57 in total

1.  A bayesian analysis strategy for cross-study translation of gene expression biomarkers.

Authors:  Joseph Lucas; Carlos Carvalho; Mike West
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-04

2.  E2F activators signal and maintain centrosome amplification in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mi-Young Lee; Carlos S Moreno; Harold I Saavedra
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  A phase 1, first-in-human study of AMG 900, an orally administered pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Michael Carducci; Montaser Shaheen; Ben Markman; Sara Hurvitz; Daruka Mahadevan; Dusan Kotasek; Oscar B Goodman; Erik Rasmussen; Vincent Chow; Gloria Juan; Gregory R Friberg; Erick Gamelin; Florian D Vogl; Jayesh Desai
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Emerging therapeutic strategies for Epstein-Barr virus+ post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Olivia Hatton; Olivia M Martinez; Carlos O Esquivel
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2012-02-21

5.  TP53 mutation-correlated genes predict the risk of tumor relapse and identify MPS1 as a potential therapeutic kinase in TP53-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Balázs Győrffy; Giulia Bottai; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; György Kéri; László Orfi; Takayuki Iwamoto; Christine Desmedt; Giampaolo Bianchini; Nicholas C Turner; Hugues de Thè; Fabrice André; Christos Sotiriou; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Angelo Di Leo; Lajos Pusztai; Libero Santarpia
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Analysis of kinase gene expression patterns across 5681 human tissue samples reveals functional genomic taxonomy of the kinome.

Authors:  Sami Kilpinen; Kalle Ojala; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association of genetic variation in mitotic kinases with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Xianshu Wang; Zachary S Fredericksen; Robert A Vierkant; Matthew L Kosel; V Shane Pankratz; James R Cerhan; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A novel role for Plk4 in regulating cell spreading and motility.

Authors:  C O Rosario; K Kazazian; F S W Zih; O Brashavitskaya; Y Haffani; R S Z Xu; A George; J W Dennis; C J Swallow
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Genetic variation in the chromosome 17q23 amplicon and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Xianshu Wang; Zachary S Fredericksen; V Shane Pankratz; Paul D P Pharoah; Shahana Ahmed; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Robert A Vierkant; James R Cerhan; Ellen L Goode; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Nek2 and Plk4: prognostic markers, drivers of breast tumorigenesis and drug resistance.

Authors:  Mihaela Marina; Harold I Saavedra
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2014-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.