Literature DB >> 18245308

Novel empirical disability weights to assess the burden of non-fatal injury.

J A Haagsma1, E F van Beeck, S Polinder, N Hoeymans, S Mulder, G J Bonsel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disability weights are necessary to estimate the disability component (years lived with disability, YLDs) of disability-adjusted life years. The original global burden of disease approach to deriving disability weights ignores temporary consequences of injury.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and apply novel empirical disability weights to improve estimates of the non-fatal burden of injury.
METHODS: A set of 45 disability weights was derived for both permanent and temporary consequences of injury, using the annual profile approach. A population panel (n = 143) provided the values. The novel set of disability weights was then linked to epidemiological surveillance data on the incidence of injury in The Netherlands to calculate YLD resulting from permanent and temporary consequences of injury.
RESULTS: The empirical disability weights for injury consequences varied from minor (corneal abrasion, 0.004) to very severe (quadriplegia, 0.719) health loss. Increasing disability weights by level of severity were found, as illustrated by concussion (0.02), versus moderate brain injury (0.193), versus severe brain injury (0.540). Application of these new disability weights showed a 36% increase in YLD as the result of unintentional injury.
CONCLUSIONS: YLD calculations based on global burden of disease disability weights underestimate the size of the injury problem by ignoring temporary health consequences. Application of novel empirical disability weights, derived using the annual profile approach, may improve calculations on the burden of non-fatal injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18245308     DOI: 10.1136/ip.2007.017178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  21 in total

1.  Improved and standardized method for assessing years lived with disability after injury.

Authors:  J A Haagsma; S Polinder; R A Lyons; J Lund; V Ditsuwan; M Prinsloo; J L Veerman; E F van Beeck
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Suzanne Polinder; Alessandro Cassini; Edoardo Colzani; Arie H Havelaar
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2014-08-23

3.  Burden of injury in childhood and adolescence in 8 European countries.

Authors:  Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A Haagsma; Hidde Toet; Marco J P Brugmans; Ed F van Beeck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Alternative approaches to derive disability weights in injuries: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; S Polinder; E F van Beeck; S Mulder; G J Bonsel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Developing a systematic approach for Population-based Injury Severity Assessment (PISA): a million-person survey in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Olakunle Alonge; Priyanka Agrawal; Khaula Khatlani; Saidur Mashreky; Dewan Emdadul Md Hoque; Adnan A Hyder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations.

Authors:  Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A Haagsma; Eefje Belt; Ronan A Lyons; Vicki Erasmus; Johan Lund; Ed F van Beeck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Measuring the population burden of injuries--implications for global and national estimates: a multi-centre prospective UK longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ronan A Lyons; Denise Kendrick; Elizabeth M Towner; Nicola Christie; Steven Macey; Carol Coupland; Belinda J Gabbe
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods.

Authors:  Denise Bijlenga; Erwin Birnie; Ben Wj Mol; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Disability adjusted life years and minimal disease: application of a preference-based relevance criterion to rank enteric pathogens.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Arie H Havelaar; Bas Mf Janssen; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2008-12-29

10.  Disease profile and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EuroQol (EQ-5D + C) questionnaire for chronic metallic mercury vapor intoxication.

Authors:  Nadine Steckling; Dietrich Plass; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Alfred Bogomir Kobal; Alexander Krämer; Claudia Hornberg
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.