BACKGROUND: Troxacitabine is a novel L-nucleoside analogue. Preclinical studies showed improved activity with infusions of at least 3 days compared with bolus regimens, especially at concentrations >20 ng/ml. This phase I study tested the feasibility of achieving a troxacitabine steady-state concentration of 20 ng/ml for at least 72 h in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors received troxacitabine as a progressively longer infusion on days 1-4 of a 28-day cycle. The initial length of infusion and infusion rate were 48 h and 3 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated at infusion lengths that increased from 48 to 72 h and then 96 h. The infusion rate was decreased from 3 to 1.88 mg/m(2)/day due to toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 4 neutropenia (three) and grade 3 constipation (one). The maximum tolerated dose of continuous infusion troxacitabine in patients with solid tumors is 7.5 mg/m(2) administered over 96 h. This dose level resulted in steady-state drug concentration of at least 20 ng/ml for 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of troxacitabine by continuous infusion achieved the prospectively defined target plasma concentration. Pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling coupled with real-time PK assessment was an efficient approach to conduct hypothesis-driven phase I trials.
BACKGROUND:Troxacitabine is a novel L-nucleoside analogue. Preclinical studies showed improved activity with infusions of at least 3 days compared with bolus regimens, especially at concentrations >20 ng/ml. This phase I study tested the feasibility of achieving a troxacitabine steady-state concentration of 20 ng/ml for at least 72 h in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors received troxacitabine as a progressively longer infusion on days 1-4 of a 28-day cycle. The initial length of infusion and infusion rate were 48 h and 3 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated at infusion lengths that increased from 48 to 72 h and then 96 h. The infusion rate was decreased from 3 to 1.88 mg/m(2)/day due to toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 4 neutropenia (three) and grade 3 constipation (one). The maximum tolerated dose of continuous infusion troxacitabine in patients with solid tumors is 7.5 mg/m(2) administered over 96 h. This dose level resulted in steady-state drug concentration of at least 20 ng/ml for 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of troxacitabine by continuous infusion achieved the prospectively defined target plasma concentration. Pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling coupled with real-time PK assessment was an efficient approach to conduct hypothesis-driven phase I trials.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: F J Giles; J E Cortes; S D Baker; D A Thomas; S O'Brien; T L Smith; M Beran; C Bivins; J Jolivet; H M Kantarjian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Francis J Giles; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jorge E Cortes; Sharyn D Baker; Carol B Miller; Susan M O'Brien; Deborah A Thomas; Michael Andreeff; Carol Bivins; Jacques Jolivet; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gail J Roboz; Francis J Giles; Ellen K Ritchie; Sandra Allen-Bard; Tania J Curcio; Meredith A Wilkes; S Lani Park; Hagop M Kantarjian; Stefan Faderl; Farhad Ravandi; Michael J Kelner; Eric J Feldman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Lapointe; R Létourneau; W Steward; R E Hawkins; G Batist; M Vincent; R Whittom; M Eatock; J Jolivet; M Moore Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Henriette Gourdeau; Philippe Genne; Salam Kadhim; Lucie Bibeau; Olivier Duchamp; France Ouellet; Jean-Marc deMuys; David Y Bouffard; Giorgio Attardo Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2002-10-16 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Joseph Stephenson; Sharyn D Baker; Manuel Hidalgo; Amita Patnaik; Lisa A Hammond; Geoffrey Weiss; Andrew Goetz; Lillian Siu; Cecelia Simmons; Jacques Jolivet; Eric K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L L Siu; G Attardo; E Izbicka; R Lawrence; C Cerna; L Gomez; K Davidson; C Finkle; C Marsolais; E K Rowinsky; D D Von Hoff Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 32.976