Literature DB >> 18243633

A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes.

Corinna Porteri1, Pascal Borry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To suggest a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials in local biobanks for health research purposes.
METHODS: Review of the major ethical issues related to collection, storage and use of human biological materials for research purposes.
RESULTS: An informed consent form for the collection and use of biological materials in a specific research project, and an informed consent form for the collection, storage and use of biological materials in a biobank were separately developed. Two main rules govern the proposed model, as follows: the informed consent for the use of biological materials shall (i) give donors sufficient information to take informed decisions about possible present and future uses of their biological materials and (ii) consider the specific biological and genetic aims of the research being performed.
CONCLUSION: Even if informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials is a hard process, donors can actually be provided with sufficient information and choices to give a 'really informed consent'. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The proposed model can be a useful guideline for the development of specific informed consent forms to be used by researchers. It can also be a good tool to let the donors know which information and guarantees they can request from researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243633     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  12 in total

1.  Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Georg Lauss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Use of a community-based participatory research approach to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs on biospecimen research among Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Patchareeya P Kwan; Greta Briand; Cevadne Lee; Jonathan Tana Lepule; Jane Ka'ala Pang; Melanie Sabado; Lola Sablan-Santos; Dorothy Schmidt-Vaivao; Sora Tanjasiri; Vanessa Tui'one; Paula H Palmer
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-01-06

3.  The policies of ethics committees in the management of biobanks used for research: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Corinna Porteri; Elena Togni; Patrizio Pasqualetti
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Areej Othman; Manal Shahrouri
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 6.  Banking brains: a pre-mortem "how to" guide to successful donation.

Authors:  Daniel Trujillo Diaz; Nora C Hernandez; Etty P Cortes; Phyllis L Faust; Jean Paul G Vonsattel; Elan D Louis
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Banking the brain. Addressing the ethical challenges of a mental-health biobank.

Authors:  Myanthi Amarasinghe; Hannah Tan; Samantha Larkin; Barbara Ruggeri; Sarah Lobo; Philip Brittain; Matthew Broadbent; Martin Baggaley; Gunter Schumann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 8.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Practice variation across consent templates for biobank research. a survey of German biobanks.

Authors:  Irene Hirschberg; Hannes Knüppel; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.

Authors:  Tessel Rigter; Lidewij Henneman; Ulf Kristoffersson; Alison Hall; Helger G Yntema; Pascal Borry; Holger Tönnies; Quinten Waisfisz; Mariet W Elting; Wybo J Dondorp; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.