Literature DB >> 18243061

Studies of Swedish adjustable gastric band and Lap-Band: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scott A Cunneen1, Edward Phillips, George Fielding, Deirdre Banel, Rhonda Estok, Kyle Fahrbach, Isabella Sledge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the large body of data describing the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB) and Lap-Band (LB).
METHODS: A systematic review was performed that included screening of studies published in any language (January 1, 1998 through April 30, 2006) identified through MEDLINE, Current Contents, or the Cochrane Library. Studies with > or =10 SAGB or LB patients reporting > or =30-day efficacy or safety outcomes were eligible for review; the data were extracted from the accepted studies. A weighted means analysis and random-effects meta-analysis of efficacy outcomes of interest were conducted.
RESULTS: A total of 4592 bariatric surgery studies met the initial criteria. Of these studies, 129 (28,980 patients) were accepted (33 SAGB and 104 LB studies); most had a retrospective single-center design. For 4273 patients (36 treatment groups) in 33 SAGB studies and 24,707 patients (111 groups) in 104 LB studies, the mean baseline age (39.1-40.2 yr), body mass index (43.8-45.3 kg/m2), and gender (women 79.2-82.5%) were similar. A laparoscopic technique was used in > or =88% and a pars flaccida technique in > or =41% of both groups. Early mortality was equivalent for SAGB/LB (< or =.1%). The 3-year mean SAGB and LB excess weight loss (56.36% and 50.20%, respectively) and body mass index reduction (-11.99 and -11.81 kg/m2, respectively) from baseline were statistically significant (P <.05), as was the resolution of diabetes (61.45% and 60.29%, respectively) and hypertension (62.95% and 43.58%, respectively). Although scant and inconsistently reported data precluded direct statistical comparisons, the complication rates for the 2 devices appeared comparable. In 8 directly comparative studies, meta-analysis found a significantly greater absolute weight loss (P <.05) with the SAGB at 2 years (48.4 versus 41.9 kg, mean difference -4.84, 95% confidence interval -9.47 to -0.22), although no difference was found in the percentage of excess weight loss or change in body mass index.
CONCLUSION: In a systematic review of the published world SAGB and LB data, at 1, 2, and 3 years, the weight loss, resolution of diabetes and hypertension, and complications appeared comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243061     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  28 in total

1.  The relationship between esophageal peristalsis and in vivo intraband pressure measurements in gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Sudip K Ghosh; Mario Gutierrez; Karin Dolezalova; Tamara Widenhouse; Gaspar Gayoso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Do adverse childhood experiences affect surgical weight loss outcomes?

Authors:  Nayna A Lodhia; Ulysses S Rosas; Michelle Moore; Alan Glaseroff; Dan Azagury; Homero Rivas; John M Morton
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparison of weight loss achieved after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding between Afro-Caribbean, Caucasian and South Asian adult female patients in a London bariatric centre.

Authors:  G K Phoenix; N Penney; D M Cocker; A Davies; J Smellie; G Bonanomi; J Thompson; E Efthimiou
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Use of standard hypodermic needles for accessing laparoscopic adjustable gastric band ports.

Authors:  Samuel Mark Bewsher; Anthony Azzi; Timothy Wright
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Long-term follow-up evaluation of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Alexander Perathoner; Matthias Zitt; Monika Lanthaler; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl; Reinhard Mittermair
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Two stages conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. A study of one hundred patients.

Authors:  Sergio Carandina; Malek Tabbara; Manuela Bossi; Nada Helmy; Claude Polliand; Christophe Barrat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Do Male Patients Benefit from Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding More than Female Patients? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maor Lewis; Uri Netz; Solly Mizrahi; Eliezer Avinoah; Doron Gal; Zvi H Perry
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Mesenteric defect closure in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ulysses Rosas; Shusmita Ahmed; Natalia Leva; Trit Garg; Homero Rivas; James Lau; Michael Russo; John M Morton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada.

Authors:  Nicolas Christou; Evangelos Efthimiou
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Use of bariatric outcomes longitudinal database (BOLD) to study variability in patient success after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Tina D Hunter; Diane M Francis; Nestor De La Cruz-Munoz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.