Literature DB >> 18242922

Emergency physicians' patterns of treatment for presumed gonorrhea and chlamydia in women: one center's practice.

Jason B Hack1, Claus Hecht.   

Abstract

No indicator reliably predicts if a woman has gonorrhea or chlamydia (sexually transmitted diseases [STDs]) during an Emergency Department (ED) visit. Before culture results return, emergency physicians (EPs) must choose whom to treat. We evaluated EP treatment of STDs within our institution. EPs voluntarily completed anonymous surveys while evaluating women requiring both a pelvic examination and STD cultures, except for sexual assault victims. The questionnaires asked for patients' demographics, history, physical examination, and in-ED laboratory tests, and whether any particular section of the encounter caused treatment. The treated and untreated groups' characteristics, as reported by the examining physicians, were compared. There were 145 questionnaires returned over a 6-month period; 41/145 patients (28%) were treated for presumed STD-28 (68%) based on physical examination, 8 (19.5%) on history, and 5 (12.5%) on in-ED laboratory tests. Comparison of treated vs. untreated groups revealed no difference in patient demographics. The treated group had more historical positives (3.92 vs. 2.84, respectively; p < 0.001) and physical examination findings (3.39 vs. 1.24, respectively; p < 0.001) compared to the untreated group. Eleven patients (7.58%) had positive STD cultures, 4 (9.75%) in the treated group and 7 (6.73%) in the untreated group (p > 0.05). In our institution, EPs chose to treat patients with more historical and physical examination findings, not based on demographics. Our EPs' presumptive STD treatment paradigms do not accurately distinguish patients with positive pelvic culture results from those with negative results, supporting the available literature that describes the difficulty of this diagnosis. Individual EDs must recognize this infection identification problem and, after assessment of their treatment population, institute either a liberal presumptive STD treatment regimen for all comers, or establish reliable and timely follow-up for women left untreated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18242922     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  4 in total

1.  Differences in Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis by Ambulatory Care Setting.

Authors:  William S Pearson; Thomas L Gift; Jami S Leichliter; Wiley D Jenkins
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

2.  Improving sexually transmitted infection results notification via mobile phone technology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Regina G Taylor; Gordon L Gillespie; Terri L Byczkowski; Jessica A Kahn; Evaline A Alessandrini
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  A Need for Standardization of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Pilot Study in an Outpatient Clinic in Quito, Ecuador.

Authors:  Francisco Cueva; Andrés Caicedo; Paula Hidalgo
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-09

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  Sasha Herbst de Cortina; Claire C Bristow; Dvora Joseph Davey; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.