Literature DB >> 18242657

Two different groups of signal sequence in M-superfamily conotoxins.

Qi Wang1, Hui Jiang, Yu-Hong Han, Duo-Duo Yuan, Cheng-Wu Chi.   

Abstract

M-superfamily conotoxins can be divided into four branches (M-1, M-2, M-3 and M-4) according to the number of amino acid residues in the third Cys loop. In general, it is widely accepted that the conotoxin signal peptides of each superfamily are strictly conserved. Recently, we cloned six cDNAs of novel M-superfamily conotoxins from Conus leopardus, Conus marmoreus and Conus quercinus, belonging to either M-1 or M-3 branch. These conotoxins, judging from the putative peptide sequences deducted from cDNAs, are rich in acidic residues and share highly conserved signal and pro-peptide region. However, they are quite different from the reported conotoxins of M-2 and M-4 branches even in their signal peptides, which in general are considered highly conserved for each superfamily of conotoxins. The signal sequences of M-1 and M-3 conotoxins composed of 24 residues start with MLKMGVVL-, while those of M-2 and M-4 conotoxins composed of 25 residues start with MMSKLGVL-. It is another example that different types of signal peptides can exist within a superfamily besides the I-conotoxin superfamily. In addition to the different disulfide connectivity of M-1 conotoxins from that of M-4 or M-2 conotoxins, the sequence alignment, preferential Cys codon usage and phylogenetic tree analysis suggest that M-1 and M-3 conotoxins have much closer relationship, being different from the conotoxins of other two branches (M-4 and M-2) of M-superfamily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18242657     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  9 in total

1.  Molecular phylogeny, classification and evolution of conopeptides.

Authors:  N Puillandre; D Koua; P Favreau; B M Olivera; R Stöcklin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Evolution of Conus peptide genes: duplication and positive selection in the A-superfamily.

Authors:  Nicolas Puillandre; Maren Watkins; Baldomero M Olivera
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Dissecting a role of evolutionary-conserved but noncritical disulfide bridges in cysteine-rich peptides using ω-conotoxin GVIA and its selenocysteine analogs.

Authors:  Konkallu Hanumae Gowd; Kirk D Blais; Keith S Elmslie; Andrew M Steiner; Baldomero M Olivera; Grzegorz Bulaj
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Deep venomics reveals the mechanism for expanded peptide diversity in cone snail venom.

Authors:  Sébastien Dutertre; Ai-hua Jin; Quentin Kaas; Alun Jones; Paul F Alewood; Richard J Lewis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 5.  The M-superfamily of conotoxins: a review.

Authors:  Reed B Jacob; Owen M McDougal
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Sample limited characterization of a novel disulfide-rich venom peptide toxin from terebrid marine snail Terebra variegata.

Authors:  Prachi Anand; Alexandre Grigoryan; Mohammed H Bhuiyan; Beatrix Ueberheide; Victoria Russell; Jose Quinoñez; Patrick Moy; Brian T Chait; Sébastien F Poget; Mandë Holford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anti-Ovarian Cancer Conotoxins Identified from Conus Venom.

Authors:  Shuang Ju; Yu Zhang; Xijun Guo; Qinghui Yan; Siyi Liu; Bokai Ma; Mei Zhang; Jiaolin Bao; Sulan Luo; Ying Fu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  On the importance of oxidative folding in the evolution of conotoxins: cysteine codon preservation through gene duplication and adaptation.

Authors:  Andrew M Steiner; Grzegorz Bulaj; Nicolas Puillandre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Discovery Methodology of Novel Conotoxins from Conus Species.

Authors:  Ying Fu; Cheng Li; Shuai Dong; Yong Wu; Dongting Zhangsun; Sulan Luo
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.