Literature DB >> 18242607

Do orthopaedic surgeons need a policy on the removal of metalwork? A descriptive national survey of practicing surgeons in the United Kingdom.

W Jamil1, M Allami, M Z Choudhury, C Mann, T Bagga, A Roberts.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Routine metalwork removal, in asymptomatic patients, remains a controversial issue. Current literature emphasises the potential hazards of implant removal and the financial implications encountered from these procedures. However, there is little literature guidance and no published research on current practice. AIM: To estimate the current state of practice of orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom regarding implant removal in asymptomatic patients.
METHODS: An analysis, by two independent observers, was performed on the postal questionnaire replies of 36% (500 out of 1390), randomly selected UK orthopaedic consultants.
RESULTS: Four hundred and seven (81%) replies were received. A total of 345 (69%) were found to be suitable for analysis. The most significant results of our study (I) 92% of orthopaedic surgeons stated that they do not routinely remove metalwork in asymptomatic skeletally mature patients; (II) 60% of trauma surgeons stated that they do routinely remove metalwork in patients aged 16 years and under; (III) 87% of the practicing surgeons indicated that they believe it is reasonable to leave metalwork in for 10 years or more; (IV) only 7% of practicing trauma surgeons who replied to this questionnaire have departmental or unit policy.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that most practicing trauma surgeons do comply with the evidence presented in the little literature available. However, we do believe that a general policy for metalwork removal is essential. Such a policy should include guidelines specific to age groups and level of surgeon who should be performing the removal procedure. Such a document would require further validated studies but would eventually serve to steer surgeons in achieving best practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18242607     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Remission rate of implant-related infections following revision surgery after fractures.

Authors:  Mohamed Al-Mayahi; Michael Betz; Daniel A Müller; Richard Stern; Phedon Tahintzi; Louis Bernard; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Domizio Suvà; Ilker Uçkay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Removal of orthopaedic implants: indications, outcome and economic implications.

Authors:  I I Onche; O E Osagie; S INuhu
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-01

3.  Effectiveness of orthopedic implant removal surgery in patients with no implant-related symptoms after fracture union of isolated lower extremity shaft fractures: patient-centered evaluation.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Jaejun Lee; Junho Nam
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Implant removal associated complications in children with limb fractures due to trauma.

Authors:  E A Gorter; D I Vos; C F M Sier; I B Schipper
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Does a minimal invasive approach reduce anterior chest wall numbness and postoperative pain in plate fixation of clavicle fractures?

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Lukas Postl; Moritz Crönlein; Sebastian Siebenlist; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Karl F Braun; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Clinical and radiological outcome following treatment of displaced lateral clavicle fractures using a locking compression plate with lateral extension: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Sebastian Siebenlist; Moritz Crönlein; Lukas Postl; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Mid-term outcome following revision surgery of clavicular non- and malunion using anatomic locking compression plate and iliac crest bone graft.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Ingo J Banke; Norbert Harrasser; Moritz Crönlein; Dominik Pförringer; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Optimum Configuration of Cannulated Compression Screws for the Fixation of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures: Finite Element Analysis Evaluation.

Authors:  Jiantao Li; Menglin Wang; Jianfeng Zhou; Lin Han; Hao Zhang; Chen Li; Lianting Li; Ming Hao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey.

Authors:  Dagmar Vos; Beate Hanson; Michiel Verhofstad
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2012-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.