Literature DB >> 18242449

Comparison of the effect of Viscoat and DuoVisc on postoperative intraocular pressure after small-incision cataract surgery.

Georg Rainer1, Eva Stifter, Alexandra Luksch, Rupert Menapace.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of Viscoat (sodium chondroitin sulfate 4%-sodium hyaluronate 3%) and DuoVisc (Viscoat and Provisc [sodium hyaluronate 1%]) on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after bilateral small-incision cataract surgery.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
METHODS: This prospective randomized study comprised 60 eyes of 30 consecutive patients with age-related cataract in both eyes. Each patient's eyes were randomly assigned to receive Viscoat or DuoVisc during cataract surgery. DuoVisc is a packet containing 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs): the dispersive Viscoat, which was used for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. In the Viscoat group, the Viscoat was used during the entire surgery. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured preoperatively as well as 1, 6, and 20 to 24 hours postoperatively.
RESULTS: One and 6 hours postoperatively, the mean IOP was significantly higher in the Viscoat group than in the DuoVisc group (25.8 mm Hg and 20.5 mm Hg, respectively, at 1 hour and 24.7 mm Hg and 21.1 mm Hg, respectively, at 6 hours) (P<.05). At 20 to 24 hours, the mean IOP was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. Intraocular pressure spikes to 30 mm Hg or higher occurred in 4 eyes in the DuoVisc group and 11 eyes in the Viscoat group (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat caused significantly higher IOP increases and significantly more IOP spikes than DuoVisc in the early postoperative period. Therefore, if Viscoat is used during cataract surgery, an additional cohesive OVD should be used for IOL implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18242449     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Residual amounts of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on the corneal endothelium following phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Mami Yoshino; Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Shinichi Ohki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Effect of latanoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/tiomolol on intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Haydar Erdogan; Ayse Vural Ozec; Cengiz Caner; Mustafa Ilker Toker; Mustafa Kemal Arici; Aysen Topalkara
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Impact of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Angel Fu; Yasoda Subramanian; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Evaluation of a new method of irrigation and aspiration for removal of ophthalmic viscoelastic device during cataract surgery in a porcine model.

Authors:  Arisa Mitani; Takashi Suzuki; Yoshitaka Tasaka; Takahiro Uda; Yukako Hiramatsu; Shiro Kawasaki; Yuichi Ohashi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  D-sorbitol can keep the viscosity of dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device at room temperature for long term.

Authors:  Eiji Nogami; Ippei Watanabe; Hirotaka Hoshi; Masakazu Kasahara; Naoto Honda; Miwako Sato; Kiyoshi Suzuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices (OVDs) in Challenging Cases: a Review.

Authors:  Andreas F Borkenstein; Eva-Maria Borkenstein; Boris Malyugin
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-10-06

7.  New ophthalmic dual-viscoelastic device in cataract surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gaspare Monaco; Mariangela Gari; Silvia Pelizzari; Arianna Lanfranchi; Giada Ruggi; Ilaria Tinto; Antonio Scialdone
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.