Literature DB >> 18242383

Limited pelvic lymph node dissection does not improve biochemical relapse-free survival at 10 years after radical prostatectomy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Christopher J Weight1, Alwyn M Reuther, Paul W Gunn, Craig R Zippe, Nivedita B Dhar, Eric A Klein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term differences in actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival rates from a contemporary series of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with and without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
METHODS: The records of 806 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases performed from January 1995 to June 1999 were reviewed. The entire subset of patients (n = 336) with low-risk disease, defined by a prostate-specific antigen level of 10 ng/mL or less, biopsy Gleason score of 6 or less, and clinical Stage T1 or T2a, who had not received adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy were divided into two groups according to whether PLND was performed (PLND group, n = 140) or omitted (no-PLND group, n = 196). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the effect of demographic, pretreatment, surgical, and pathologic factors on the likelihood of biochemical failure. Biochemical relapse-free survival for each group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median prostate-specific antigen follow-up time for the entire group was 89.0 months, with a similar follow-up for both cohorts (PLND group 94.5 months and no-PLND group 88.0 months, Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.14).
RESULTS: The long-term biochemical relapse-free survival rate for the entire cohort was 86.1% at 10 years. The 10-year actuarial biochemical relapse-free rate for the PLND and no-PLND groups was 83.8% and 87.9%, respectively (log-rank, P = 0.33). On univariate analysis, PLND was not an independent predictor of outcome (Wald, P = 0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that the omission of limited PLND in patients with favorable tumor characteristics does not adversely affect biochemical relapse-free survival at 10 years. Such patients can be spared the morbidity and cost of PLND without affecting their chance for cure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18242383     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Should all men having a radical prostatectomy have a pelvic lymph node dissection? No.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

4.  PSA density versus risk stratification for lymphadenectomy-making decision in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.

Authors:  K A Keegan; M S Cookson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  [Role of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer].

Authors:  T Schlomm; C Börgermann; H Heinzer; H Rübben; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jae Young Joung; In-Chang Cho; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-07-24

Review 8.  Current technique and results for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Roger Li; Firas G Petros; Janet B Kukreja; Stephen B Williams; John W Davis
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-08

9.  Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Hyungwoo Ahn; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Gheeyoung Choe; Sangchul Lee; Hakmin Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 10.  Extended lymph node dissection in robotic radical prostatectomy: Current status.

Authors:  Sameer Chopra; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Inderbir Gill; Monish Aron
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.