Literature DB >> 18242362

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion: a single center experience of 48 cases with three years of follow-up.

Ashok K Hemal1, Surendra B Kolla, Pankaj Wadhwa, Prem N Dogra, Narmada P Gupta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion for high-grade muscle invasive bladder cancer in a consecutive series of 48 patients with 3 years of follow-up.
METHODS: From June 1999 to April 2006, 48 patients (42 men and 6 women; mean age 59 years, range 24 to 80) with bladder cancer underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection at our institution. Urinary diversion was done extracorporeally through the specimen extraction incision.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 310 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 456 mL. In 1 patient, conversion to open surgery was required because of severe hypercarbia. Three major complications were observed intraoperatively (rectal injury in 2 and external iliac vein injury in 1 patient). However, all these complications were managed laparoscopically, with completion of the procedure laparoscopically. The mean hospital stay was 10.2 days (range 7 to 25). One patient died in the postoperative period of severe lower respiratory tract infection and septicemia. Histologic examination showed organ-confined tumors (Stage pT1/pT2/pT3a) in 34 patients (71%) and extravesical disease (pT3b/pT4) in 14 (29%). Of the 48 patients, 12 (25%) had lymph node involvement. The mean number of nodes removed was 14 (range 4 to 24). At a mean follow-up period of 38 months (range 10 to 72), 35 patients were alive with no evidence of disease (disease-free survival rate 73%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a safe, feasible, and effective alternative to open radical cystectomy. Extracorporeal urinary diversion through a small incision decreases the operating time, while maintaining the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The 3-year oncologic efficacy was comparable to that of open radical cystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18242362     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of surgical stress response to laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Sheng-Zheng Wang; Yu Chen; Huan-Yi Lin; Ling-Wu Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Emilio Ríos González; Jorge Juan López-Tello García; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro Lorenzo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Developing minimally invasive surgery centers within kaiser permanente: the integrated multidisciplinary experience of los angeles.

Authors:  Gary W Chien; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

5.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula for patients with supratrigonal fistula: comparison with open transperitoneal technique.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Yunhua Tang; Fang Huang; Longfei Liu; Xiangyang Zhang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Oncological risk of laparoscopic surgery in urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Gordon Smyth; Jacques Irani; Laurent Guy; Jean-Louis Davin; Fabien Saint; Christian Pfister; Hervé Wallerand; François Rozet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes with 5-year follow-upT Lin et al.

Authors:  T Lin; X Fan; C Zhang; K Xu; H Liu; J Zhang; C Jiang; H Huang; J Han; Y Yao; W Xie; W Dong; L Bi; J Huang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for elderly patients over 75-year-old: a single center comparative analysis.

Authors:  Shuxiong Zeng; Zhensheng Zhang; Xiaowen Yu; Ruixiang Song; Rongchao Wei; Junjie Zhao; Linhui Wang; Jianguo Hou; Yinghao Sun; Chuanliang Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Amr Fergany
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-02-20

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center.

Authors:  Waleed Mohamed Fadlalla; Ayman Hanafy; Mahmoud Abdelhakim; Hatem Aboulkassem; El Sayed Ashraf; Ahmed Abdelbary
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.