BACKGROUND: The goals for the management of COPD are to delay the process of disease progression and alleviate its manifestations. The follow-up of the patients' physical and mental condition is part of best practice management when monitoring routines results in information that contributes to the achievement of management goals. However, the recommendations on monitoring procedures may differ between guidelines and may not be based on scientific evidence. The aim of this article is to review the current guideline recommendations on monitoring routines for COPD. METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines on the management of COPD were identified by a Medline search, Internet search and expanded by experts in the respiratory field. Guidelines on the management of COPD were analysed on recommended monitoring routines, recommended frequency of monitoring. RESULTS: Eighteen clinical practice guidelines on the management of COPD were analysed. The follow-up of lung function indices was the most frequently recommended monitoring routine. Moreover, monitoring of symptoms, exercise tolerance, comorbidity, and smoking habits were recommended regularly. In none of the guidelines, the recommended monitoring routines were evidence based. Only one guideline provides a different set of monitoring parameters for advanced COPD compared to mild and moderate COPD. CONCLUSION: Some monitoring routines were recommended frequently, especially follow-up of lung function indices. However, evidence to support the guideline recommendations for the monitoring of patients with COPD is missing. The effect of monitoring on care process and outcomes should be assessed.
BACKGROUND: The goals for the management of COPD are to delay the process of disease progression and alleviate its manifestations. The follow-up of the patients' physical and mental condition is part of best practice management when monitoring routines results in information that contributes to the achievement of management goals. However, the recommendations on monitoring procedures may differ between guidelines and may not be based on scientific evidence. The aim of this article is to review the current guideline recommendations on monitoring routines for COPD. METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines on the management of COPD were identified by a Medline search, Internet search and expanded by experts in the respiratory field. Guidelines on the management of COPD were analysed on recommended monitoring routines, recommended frequency of monitoring. RESULTS: Eighteen clinical practice guidelines on the management of COPD were analysed. The follow-up of lung function indices was the most frequently recommended monitoring routine. Moreover, monitoring of symptoms, exercise tolerance, comorbidity, and smoking habits were recommended regularly. In none of the guidelines, the recommended monitoring routines were evidence based. Only one guideline provides a different set of monitoring parameters for advanced COPD compared to mild and moderate COPD. CONCLUSION: Some monitoring routines were recommended frequently, especially follow-up of lung function indices. However, evidence to support the guideline recommendations for the monitoring of patients with COPD is missing. The effect of monitoring on care process and outcomes should be assessed.
Authors: Esther Pwa Talboom-Kamp; Noortje A Verdijk; Marise J Kasteleyn; Lara M Harmans; Irvin Jsh Talboom; Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker; Nan van Geloven; Mattijs E Numans; Niels H Chavannes Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Aizhamal Tabyshova; John R Hurst; Joan B Soriano; William Checkley; Erick Wan-Chun Huang; Antigona C Trofor; Oscar Flores-Flores; Patricia Alupo; Gonzalo Gianella; Tarana Ferdous; David Meharg; Jennifer Alison; Jaime Correia de Sousa; Maarten J Postma; Niels H Chavannes; Job F M van Boven Journal: Chest Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Yeon Jae Kim; Byung Ki Lee; Chi Young Jung; Young June Jeon; Dae Sung Hyun; Kyung Chan Kim; Sung Ken Yu; Hye Sook Choi; Won Hyuk Shin; Kwan Ho Lee Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: Esther Pwa Talboom-Kamp; Noortje A Verdijk; Marise J Kasteleyn; Lara M Harmans; Irvin Jsh Talboom; Mattijs E Numans; Niels H Chavannes Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.428