Literature DB >> 18242044

Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.

Lennart Hardell1, Cindy Sage.   

Abstract

During recent years there has been increasing public concern on potential health risks from power-frequency fields (extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields; ELF) and from radiofrequency/microwave radiation emissions (RF) from wireless communications. Non-thermal (low-intensity) biological effects have not been considered for regulation of microwave exposure, although numerous scientific reports indicate such effects. The BioInitiative Report is based on an international research and public policy initiative to give an overview of what is known of biological effects that occur at low-intensity electromagnetic fields (EMFs) exposure. Health endpoints reported to be associated with ELF and/or RF include childhood leukaemia, brain tumours, genotoxic effects, neurological effects and neurodegenerative diseases, immune system deregulation, allergic and inflammatory responses, breast cancer, miscarriage and some cardiovascular effects. The BioInitiative Report concluded that a reasonable suspicion of risk exists based on clear evidence of bioeffects at environmentally relevant levels, which, with prolonged exposures may reasonably be presumed to result in health impacts. Regarding ELF a new lower public safety limit for habitable space adjacent to all new or upgraded power lines and for all other new constructions should be applied. A new lower limit should also be used for existing habitable space for children and/or women who are pregnant. A precautionary limit should be adopted for outdoor, cumulative RF exposure and for cumulative indoor RF fields with considerably lower limits than existing guidelines, see the BioInitiative Report. The current guidelines for the US and European microwave exposure from mobile phones, for the brain are 1.6 W/Kg and 2 W/Kg, respectively. Since use of mobile phones is associated with an increased risk for brain tumour after 10 years, a new biologically based guideline is warranted. Other health impacts associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields not summarized here may be found in the BioInitiative Report at www.bioinitiative.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18242044     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother        ISSN: 0753-3322            Impact factor:   6.529


  49 in total

1.  Effects of paternal electromagnetic pulse exposure on the reproductive endocrine function of male offspring: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ming-Juan Yang; Hai-Yang Lang; Xia Miao; Hai-Qiang Liu; Yan-Jun Zhang; Ya-Feng Wang; Yong-Bin Chen; Jun-Ye Liu; Li-Hua Zeng; Guo-Zhen Guo
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  The Effect of Prenatal Exposure to 2.4 GHz Radio Frequency on the Histology and Expression of the osteocalcin and RUNX2 Gene of the Forelimb in an NMRI Mouse.

Authors:  Shaghayegh Amandokht Saghezchi; Nahid Azad; Reihane Heidari; Vahid Jajarmi; Shabnam Abdi; Hojjat-Allah Abaszadeh; Seyedeh Susan Sadjadpour; Naheid Neikoei; Mohammad Hassan Heidari; Mohammad-Amin Abdollahifar
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

3.  Use of cell phones and brain tumors: a true association?

Authors:  Ettore Beghi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Precision knockdown of EGFR gene expression using radio frequency electromagnetic energy.

Authors:  Ilya V Ulasov; Haidn Foster; Mike Butters; Jae-Geun Yoon; Tomoko Ozawa; Theodore Nicolaides; Xavier Figueroa; Parvinder Hothi; Michael Prados; John Butters; Charles Cobbs
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Understanding and determining the etiology of autism.

Authors:  Salvatore A Currenti
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Does exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields produce functional changes in human brain?

Authors:  F Capone; M Dileone; P Profice; F Pilato; G Musumeci; G Minicuci; F Ranieri; R Cadossi; S Setti; P A Tonali; V Di Lazzaro
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards.

Authors:  Dariusz Leszczynski; Zhengping Xu
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-01-27

8.  Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro.

Authors:  Geoffry N De Iuliis; Rhiannon J Newey; Bruce V King; R John Aitken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system.

Authors:  Nisarg R Desai; Kavindra K Kesari; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures.

Authors:  Mike Dolan; Jack Rowley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.