Literature DB >> 18241992

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Neospora caninum infection in different dog populations in Spain.

E Collantes-Fernández1, M Gómez-Bautista, G Miró, G Alvarez-García, J Pereira-Bueno, C Frisuelos, L M Ortega-Mora.   

Abstract

In this study, Neospora caninum seroprevalence and some associated risk factors were investigated in four different dog populations in Spain. N. caninum seropositivity was significantly higher in farm dogs (51%, 51/100) (P<0.001) and lower in household dogs (2.9%, 3/102) (P<0.0001). The seroprevalence in hunting (23%, 23/100) and stray (24.5%, 23/94) dogs was moderate, and no significant differences were observed between these two populations (P>0.05). A significantly higher number of dogs showed titres of 1:50-1:100 (68%, 68/100) than >or=1:200 (33%, 33/100) titres (P<0.0001). N. caninum antibodies were more often detected in mixed breed than pure breed dogs (P<0.01), but when data were stratified by dog type a significant association was not found (P>0.05). A significantly higher prevalence of N. caninum was observed in dogs over 1 year old (P<0.01), indicating that horizontal transmission may be the most important route of infection. The presence of N. caninum antibodies was significantly more frequent in Leishmania infantum-seropositive hunting (P<0.05) and stray dogs (P<0.00001). This study confirms that farm, stray and hunting dogs can be considered at-risk dog populations for N. caninum infection in Spain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18241992     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  7 in total

1.  Kennel dogs as sentinels of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Majorca Island, Spain.

Authors:  Oscar Cabezón; Javier Millán; Margalida Gomis; Jitender P Dubey; Ezio Ferroglio; Sonia Almería
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Risk factors of Neospora caninum infection in dogs and cats in dairy farms in Western Thailand.

Authors:  Pipat Arunvipas; Tawin Inpankaew; Sathaporn Jittapalapong
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Prevalence of antibodies against Neospora caninum in dogs from urban areas in Central Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Goździk; Robert Wrzesień; Adrianna Wielgosz-Ostolska; Justyna Bień; Monika Kozak-Ljunggren; Władysław Cabaj
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  A review of neosporosis and pathologic findings of Neospora caninum infection in wildlife.

Authors:  Shannon L Donahoe; Scott A Lindsay; Mark Krockenberger; David Phalen; Jan Šlapeta
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs.

Authors:  Helio Langoni; Felipe Fornazari; Rodrigo Costa da Silva; Elis Talita Monti; Fausto Baptista Villa
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.476

6.  Molecular and Serological Evaluation of Neospora caninum Infection in Dogs from a Rural Setting in Fars Province, Southern Iran.

Authors:  Morvarid Hariri; Nasir Arefkhah; Fariba Ghorbani; Mehdi Namavari; Mostafa Omidian; Bahador Sarkari
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.012

7.  Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum-specific antibodies in German breeding bitches.

Authors:  Rodolfo Villagra-Blanco; Lora Angelova; Theresa Conze; Gereon Schares; Andrea Bärwald; Anja Taubert; Carlos Hermosilla; Axel Wehrend
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.