BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether, according to the currently available literature, proton therapy (PT) has a role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to assess its safety and efficacy and to evaluate the main technical issues specifically related to this treatment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During March 2007, two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the current data on the treatment of NSCLC with PT. RESULTS: In total, 113 reports were retrieved, 17 of which were included in the analysis. There were no prospective trials (randomized or non-randomized). Nine uncontrolled single-arm studies were available from three PT centers, providing clinical outcomes for 214 patients in total. These reports were mainly related to stage I-II tumors, with results comparable to those obtained with surgery, without significant toxicity. In addition, two papers were found that compared photon and proton dose distributions, which showed a potential for dose escalation and/or a sparing of the organ at risk with PT. Finally, six studies analyzed dosimetric and technical issues related with PT, mainly underlining the difficulties in designing dose distributions that are representative of the dose actually delivered during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although from a physical point of view PT is a good option for the treatment of NSCLC, limited data are available on its application in the clinical practice. Furthermore, the application of PT to lung cancer does present technical challenges. Because of the small number of institutions involved in the treatment of this disease, number of patients, and methodological weaknesses of the trials it is therefore not possible to draw definitive conclusions about the superiority of PT with respect to the photon techniques currently available for the treatment of NSCLC.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether, according to the currently available literature, proton therapy (PT) has a role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to assess its safety and efficacy and to evaluate the main technical issues specifically related to this treatment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During March 2007, two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the current data on the treatment of NSCLC with PT. RESULTS: In total, 113 reports were retrieved, 17 of which were included in the analysis. There were no prospective trials (randomized or non-randomized). Nine uncontrolled single-arm studies were available from three PT centers, providing clinical outcomes for 214 patients in total. These reports were mainly related to stage I-II tumors, with results comparable to those obtained with surgery, without significant toxicity. In addition, two papers were found that compared photon and proton dose distributions, which showed a potential for dose escalation and/or a sparing of the organ at risk with PT. Finally, six studies analyzed dosimetric and technical issues related with PT, mainly underlining the difficulties in designing dose distributions that are representative of the dose actually delivered during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although from a physical point of view PT is a good option for the treatment of NSCLC, limited data are available on its application in the clinical practice. Furthermore, the application of PT to lung cancer does present technical challenges. Because of the small number of institutions involved in the treatment of this disease, number of patients, and methodological weaknesses of the trials it is therefore not possible to draw definitive conclusions about the superiority of PT with respect to the photon techniques currently available for the treatment of NSCLC.
Authors: Laleh Kardar; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-08-12
Authors: Clemens Grassberger; Juliane Daartz; Stephen Dowdell; Thomas Ruggieri; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alfredo E Echeverria; Matthew McCurdy; Richard Castillo; Vincent Bernard; Natalia Velez Ramos; William Buckley; Edward Castillo; Ping Liu; Josue Martinez; Thomas Guerrero Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang; Timothy G Jones; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Robert D Stewart; Andrew Lee; Oleg Vassiliev Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 6.639