Literature DB >> 18241706

The coblation tonsillectomy learning curve.

A Simon Carney1, Penelope K Harris, Patricia L MacFarlane, Simon Nasser, Adrian Esterman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish if there is a learning curve for coblation tonsillectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Regression analysis of data obtained from surgeons identified from the Australian Tonsillectomy Survey. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty otolaryngologists were invited to contribute audit data. Data were stratified into groups of 10 procedures and analysed with regression analysis.
RESULTS: Nineteen (70%) surgeons responded. Complete data were obtained for 1700 cases and return to theatre data on 2062 cases. There was a significant learning curve with respect to both primary (P = 0.050) and secondary (P = 0.028) hemorrhage rates. Mean rates were 0.3% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.7%) and 2.1% (95% CI 1.5% to 2.9%) for primary and secondary bleeds, respectively, with return to theatre in 0.2% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.5%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.9% to 1.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of coblation tonsillectomy into Australia was associated with a statistically significant learning curve with respect to both primary and secondary hemorrhage rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241706     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  10 in total

1.  Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage in children: a single surgeon's experience with coblation compared to diathermy.

Authors:  Jeong-Whun Kim; Sue Jean Mun; Woo-Hyun Lee; Ji-Hun Mo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  High incidence of post-tonsillectomy secondary haemorrhage following coblation tonsillectomy.

Authors:  C V Praveen; Subashini Parthiban; R M Terry
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10-27

3.  Recent medical devices for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  I Sayin; C Cingi
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 4.  Coblation tonsillectomy: a systematic review and descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Metcalfe; Jameel Muzaffar; Charles Daultrey; Christopher Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Hemorrhage rates following coblation tonsillectomy. A meta-analysis of published trials].

Authors:  R Mösges; K Albrecht; M Hellmich; S Allekotte; M Vogtel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Coblation tonsillectomy: is it inherently bloody?

Authors:  I Khan; E Abelardo; N W Scott; M Shakeel; O Menakaya; M Jaramillo; K Mahmood
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Hemorrhage rate after coblation tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  Ralph Mösges; Martin Hellmich; Silke Allekotte; Kerstin Albrecht; Myriam Böhm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  What Are the Trends in Tonsillectomy Techniques in Wales? A Prospective Observational Study of 19,195 Tonsillectomies over a 10-Year Period.

Authors:  Hussein Walijee; Ali Al-Hussaini; Andrew Harris; David Owens
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26

9.  Reference rate for post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage in Australia-A 2000-2020 national hospital morbidity database analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan C Li; Martin Forer; David Veivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Intracapsular tonsillectomy in the treatment of recurrent and chronic tonsillitis in adults: a protocol of a prospective, single-blinded, randomised study with a 5-year follow-up (the FINITE trial).

Authors:  Jaakko Matias Piitulainen; Tapani Uusitalo; Henrik M Sjöblom; Lotta E Ivaska; Henri Jegoroff; Tommi Kauko; Hannu Kokki; Eero Kytö; Iisa Mansikka; Jenni Ylikoski; Jussi Jero
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.006

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.