Literature DB >> 18241219

Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.

Victoria Franke Stenport1, Carina B Johansson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed for comparisons of tissue integration to commercially pure (CP) and titanium-6-aluminum-4 vanadium (Ti-6-Al-4V) implants using various existing three-dimensional biomechanical and two-dimensional histomorphometrical techniques, and to monitor the loosening torque during in vivo removal torque (RTQ) test with a novel unit not used before in a pilot study in rabbits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants were topographically characterized and inserted in femurs and tibiae of five rabbits (in total 40 implants, 20 per group). After 16 weeks, the implant integration was biomechanically evaluated by: (1) resonance frequency test, and (2) peak RTQ test and the graph from the monitoring curve. Biopsies of the implants in situ were processed to undecalcified cut and ground sections followed by light microscopical quantifications. Shear strength calculations were performed.
RESULTS: Significantly higher mean value of RTQ (p = .01) and shear strength tests (p = .03) were observed for the CP titanium implants compared to Ti-6-Al-4V implants. The monitoring curve from the RTQ test demonstrated no differences in the shape or form that could provide further information about the differences in the implant-to-bone attachment.
CONCLUSIONS: The CP titanium implants showed increased RTQ and shear strength values compared to the Ti-6-Al-4V implants. The new tool of monitoring the RTQ curve could not demonstrate differences between the two materials. The exact influence of the implant materials on the surrounding tissues needs to be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241219     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  5 in total

1.  Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Rolando A Gittens; Jennifer M Schneider; Sharon L Hyzy; David A Haithcock; Peter F Ullrich; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

3.  Rough titanium alloys regulate osteoblast production of angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Rolando A Gittens; Jennifer M Schneider; David A Haithcock; Peter F Ullrich; Paul J Slosar; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Implant materials generate different peri-implant inflammatory factors: poly-ether-ether-ketone promotes fibrosis and microtextured titanium promotes osteogenic factors.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Paul J Slosar; Jennifer M Schneider; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Three-dimensional modeling of removal torque and fracture progression around implants.

Authors:  Kohei Murase; Patrik Stenlund; Peter Thomsen; Jukka Lausmaa; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.896

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.