Literature DB >> 18241018

Statistical relevance of ultrasonographic criteria in the assessment of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats.

Daniel A Feeney1, Kari L Anderson, Laura E Ziegler, Carl R Jessen, Brian M Daubs, Robert M Hardy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether objectively applied ultrasonographic interpretive criteria are statistically useful in differentiating among 7 defined categories of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats. SAMPLE POPULATION: Ultrasonographic images of 229 dogs and 104 cats. PROCEDURES: Liver parenchymal or related sonographic criteria established by the authors were retrospectively and independently applied by 3 radiologists who were not aware of patient status or patient laboratory data. Seven histologic or cytologic categories of diffuse (infiltrative but not nodular) liver diseases were jointly established by the authors and included normal liver; inflammation; round-cell neoplasia; non-round-cell infiltrative, prenodular (early) metastatic neoplasia; lipidosis; vacuolar hepatopathy; and other. Liver parenchymal sonographic criteria included parenchymal sound attenuation with increasing depth, comparative organ echogenicity (liver, spleen, and kidneys), diffuse or patchy hyperechoic or hypoechoic echotexture, uniform or coarse echotexture, portal venous clarity, and liver lobe geometry. Related extrahepatic criteria included gallbladder wall thickness, bile duct diameter, amount and character of gallbladder precipitate, nondependent shadowing in the gallbladder, hepatic vein diameter versus caudal vena cava diameter, peritoneal fluid, spleen echotexture (normal vs abnormal [characterized]), and kidney echotexture. Ultrasonographic criteria were statistically compared to the 7 categories of diffuse liver disease in search of clinically exploitable relationships.
RESULTS: Statistical evaluation of the applied ultrasonographic criteria did not yield clinically acceptable accuracy for discrimination among the 7 categories of diffuse liver diseases (including normal liver) in either species. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Criterion-based ultrasonographic appearance was insufficient to discriminate among canine and feline diffuse infiltrative liver diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241018     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.69.2.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  13 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic characteristics of the portal venous system of 37 healthy, unsedated, student-owned cats: A prospective study.

Authors:  Maxime Derré; Catherine Layssol-Lamour
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.075

2.  Parenchymal signal intensity in 3-T body MRI of dogs with hematopoietic neoplasia.

Authors:  Daniel A Feeney; Leslie C Sharkey; Susan M Steward; Katherine L Bahr; Michael S Henson; Daisuke Ito; Timothy D O'Brien; Carl R Jessen; Brian D Husbands; Antonella Borgatti; Jaime F Modiano
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Ultrasound imaging in an experimental model of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis in rats.

Authors:  Andréia S Lessa; Bruno D Paredes; Juliana V Dias; Adriana B Carvalho; Luiz Fernando Quintanilha; Christina M Takiya; Bernardo R Tura; Guilherme F M Rezende; Antonio C Campos de Carvalho; Célia M C Resende; Regina C S Goldenberg
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  A descriptive study of the histopathologic and biochemical liver test abnormalities in dogs with liver disease in Thailand.

Authors:  Sathidpak N Assawarachan; Phudit Maneesaay; Naris Thengchaisri
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Chronic hepatitis in the English springer spaniel: clinical presentation, histological description and outcome.

Authors:  N H Bexfield; C Andres-Abdo; T J Scase; F Constantino-Casas; P J Watson
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the hepatic vein in normal dogs.

Authors:  Keitaro Morishita; Akira Hiramoto; Tatsuyuki Osuga; Sue Yee Lim; Nisa Khoirun; Noboru Sasaki; Kensuke Nakamura; Hiroshi Ohta; Masahiro Yamasaki; Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Clinical and histologic outcome in a dog surviving massive hepatic necrosis.

Authors:  Peter H Kook; Miriam Baumstark; Maja Ruetten
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Evaluation of hepatobiliary ultrasound scores in healthy dogs and dogs with liver diseases.

Authors:  Sathidpak Nantasanti Assawarachan; Piyathip Chuchalermporn; Phudit Maneesaay; Naris Thengchaisri
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-08-17

9.  Agreement of serum Spec cPL with the 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase assay and with pancreatic ultrasonography in dogs with suspected pancreatitis.

Authors:  P H Kook; N Kohler; S Hartnack; B Riond; C E Reusch
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat content in healthy dogs by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dual gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Francesca Del Chicca; Andrea Schwarz; Dieter Meier; Paula Grest; Annette Liesegang; Patrick R Kircher
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.