Literature DB >> 18239989

Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn: a population-based study in the Maribor region, 1997-2005.

Milena Treiber1, Tomaz Tomazic, Andreja Tekauc-Golob, Joze Zolger, Bojan Korpar, Silva Burja, Iztok Takac, Aleksander Sikosek.   

Abstract

AIM: Ultrasound imaging has become an accepted tool for accurate diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and for its management. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results of the general neonatal hip screening program in Maribor between 1997 and 2005 in comparison with earlier reported results for our region, where this program was introduced in 1985. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the total number of 17,846 newborns born in our maternity hospital, 17,393 were included in the study during the nine-year period. All hips were examined by ultrasonography within the first week of life. Data for 2.5% of newborns were not available. The incidence of sonographic hip types according to the Graf method was analyzed, together with the sex distribution, lateralization of hip pathology and treatment recommendations.
RESULTS: A total of 34,786 hips were evaluated sonographically: 84.9% of hips were mature at first examination (Graf types Ia and Ib), 14.1% were immature (Graf type IIa) and 1.1% were pathological (Graf types IIc or worse). In the group of pathological hips, girls were more frequently affected than boys (3.9:1) and the left hip was more frequently affected than the right (1.2:1). The incidence of hip types IIc or worse decreased sevenfold throughout the observation period, from 2.1 in 1997 to 0.3 in 2005. This distribution of hip types resulted in an average treatment rate of 18 newborns per 1000 live borns, down from 42 treated hips per 1000 newborns in 1997 to 6 hips per 1000 in 2005. During this nine-year period, only 19 children required surgical treatment for DDH before the age of three years.
CONCLUSION: In our region, general ultrasound hip screening of newborns for DDH seems to be effective in reducing the overall treatment rate. The number of surgical procedures has remained stable during the past nine-year screening period and is lower than in the pre-ultrasound era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18239989     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-007-0922-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  23 in total

1.  Ultrasonography screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip joint.

Authors:  G Hansson; S Jacobsen
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Longitudinal study of normal hip development by ultrasound.

Authors:  Jacques P Riad; Peter Cundy; Roger J Gent; Lino Piotto; Lloyd Morris; Craig Hirte
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method.

Authors:  E A Simon; F Saur; M Buerge; R Glaab; M Roos; G Kohler
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 4.  Development dysplasia of the hip from birth to six months.

Authors:  J T Guille; P D Pizzutillo; G D MacEwen
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  The significance of at-risk factors in ultrasound surveillance of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A ten-year prospective study.

Authors:  R W Paton; K Hinduja; C D Thomas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

Review 6.  Neonatal hip screening.

Authors:  Deborah M Eastwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany.

Authors:  Rüdiger von Kries; Nicola Ihme; Doris Oberle; Anette Lorani; Renee Stark; Lutz Altenhofen; Fritz Uwe Niethard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip. A population-based comparison of ultrasound and clinical findings.

Authors:  K Rosendahl; T Markestad; R T Lie
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Instability of the neonatal hip: the role of early or late splintage.

Authors:  R W Paton; P J Hopgood; K Eccles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15,529 newborn infants.

Authors:  K J Holen; A Tegnander; T Bredland; O J Johansen; O D Saether; S H Eik-Nes; T Terjesen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns.

Authors:  Mohammad Schams; Rob Labruyère; Anne Zuse; Mikolaj Walensi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  [Incidence and duration of therapy of pathological hip findings in U2 and U3 examinations (SNiP study)].

Authors:  A Lange; J Lange; R Thyrian; J P Haas; A Ekkernkamp; H Merk; W Hoffmann; H N Lode
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Reliability of ultrasonographic measurements in suspected patients of developmental dysplasia of the hip and correlation with the acetabular index.

Authors:  Cem Copuroglu; Mert Ozcan; Bilal Aykac; Beyti Tuncer; Kenan Saridogan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Selective ultrasound screening is inadequate to identify patients who present with symptomatic adult acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Ernest L Sink; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Katrina Dela Torre; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Population-based study of the incidence of congenital hip dysplasia in preterm infants from the Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP).

Authors:  A E Lange; J Lange; Till Ittermann; M Napp; Paul-Christian Krueger; H Bahlmann; R Kasch; M Heckmann
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Incidence of Neonatal Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Late Detection Rates Based on Screening Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilari Kuitunen; Mikko M Uimonen; Marjut Haapanen; Reijo Sund; Ilkka Helenius; Ville T Ponkilainen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 7.  The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Elaine N Skopelja
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.