Literature DB >> 18239988

Differentiation of nonalcoholic from alcoholic steatohepatitis: are routine laboratory markers useful?

Lili Kazemi-Shirazi1, Moema Pinheiro Veloso, Florian Frommlet, Petra Steindl-Munda, Fritz Wrba, Sonja Zehetmayer, Claudia Marsik, Peter Ferenci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Specific markers for differentiation of nonalcoholic (NASH) from alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH) are lacking. We investigated the role of routine laboratory parameters in distinguishing NASH from ASH.
METHODS: Liver biopsies performed at our hospital over a 10-year period were reviewed, 95 patients with steatohepatitis identified and their data prior to biopsy reevaluated. The diagnosis NASH or ASH was assigned (other liver diseases excluded) on the basis of the biopsy and history of alcohol consumption (< 140 g/week). Logistic regression models were used for analysis.
RESULTS: NASH was diagnosed in 58 patients (61%; 30 f) and ASH in 37 (39%; 9 f). High-grade fibrosis (59% vs. 19%, P < 0.0001) and an AST/ALT ratio > 1 (54.1% vs 20.7%, P = 0.0008) were more common in ASH. The MCV was elevated in 53% of ASH patients and normal in all NASH patients (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the MCV (P = 0.0013), the AST/ALT ratio (P = 0.011) and sex (P = 0.0029) as relevant regressors (aROC = 0.92). The AST/ALT ratio (P < 0.0001) and age (P = 0.00049) were independent predictors of high-grade fibrosis. Differences in MCV were more marked in high-grade fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher MCVs and AST/ALT ratios in ASH reflect the severity of underlying liver disease and do not differentiate NASH from ASH. Instead, these biomarkers might prove useful in guiding selection of patients for liver biopsy and in targeting therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18239988     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-007-0921-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  32 in total

1.  New diagnostic markers of alcohol abuse.

Authors:  L Lumeng
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Utility of a new model to diagnose an alcohol basis for steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Winston Dunn; Paul Angulo; Schuyler Sanderson; Laith H Jamil; Linda Stadheim; Charles Rosen; Michael Malinchoc; Patrick S Kamath; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions.

Authors:  E M Brunt; C G Janney; A M Di Bisceglie; B A Neuschwander-Tetri; B R Bacon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  High AST/ALT ratio may indicate advanced alcoholic liver disease rather than heavy drinking.

Authors:  H Nyblom; U Berggren; J Balldin; R Olsson
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Ratio of serum aspartate to alanine aminotransferase in chronic hepatitis. Relationship to cirrhosis.

Authors:  A L Williams; J H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Diagnostic utility of laboratory tests in alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  A S Rosman; C S Lieber
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clinicopathological comparison with alcoholic hepatitis in ambulatory and hospitalized patients.

Authors:  H C Pinto; A Baptista; M E Camilo; A Valente; A Saragoça; M C de Moura
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Hepatic iron concentration does not predict response to standard and pegylated-IFN/ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Harald Hofer; Christoph Osterreicher; Wolfgang Jessner; Melitta Penz; Petra Steindl-Munda; Friedrich Wrba; Peter Ferenci
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Joint use of clinical parameters, biological markers and CAGE questionnaire for the identification of heavy drinkers in a large population-based sample.

Authors:  Vincent Bataille; Jean-Bernard Ruidavets; Dominique Arveiler; Philippe Amouyel; Pierre Ducimetière; Bertrand Perret; Jean Ferrières
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 10.  Conference summary: Consensus Conference on Alcohol Dependence and the Role of Pharmacotherapy in its Treatment.

Authors:  J Chick; C K Erickson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  Cara Torruellas; Samuel W French; Valentina Medici
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Innate immune dysfunction in acute and chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Bettina Leber; Ursula Mayrhauser; Michael Rybczynski; Vanessa Stadlbauer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  What is the real function of the liver 'function' tests?

Authors:  Philip Hall; Johnny Cash
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2012-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.