PURPOSE: Gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK), has shown potent effects in a subset of patients carrying specific EGFR-TK mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In this study, we asked whether PET with [(18)F]gefitinib may be used to study noninvasively the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in vivo and to image the EGFR status of cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthesis of [(18)F]gefitinib has been previously described. The biodistribution and metabolic stability of [(18)F]gefitinib was assessed in mice and vervet monkeys for up to 2 h post injection by both micropositron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans and postmortem ex vivo tissue harvesting. Uptake levels of radiolabeled gefitinib in EGFR-expressing human cancer cell lines with various levels of EGFR expression or mutation status were evaluated both in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: MicroPET/CT scans in two species demonstrated a rapid and predominantly hepatobiliary clearance of [(18)F]gefitinib in vivo. However, uptake levels of radiolabeled gefitinib, both in vivo and in vitro, did not correlate with EGFR expression levels or functional status. This unexpected observation was due to high nonspecific, nonsaturable cellular uptake of gefitinib. CONCLUSION: The biodistribution of the drug analogue [(18)F]gefitinib suggests that it may be used to assess noninvasively the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in patients by PET imaging. This is of clinical relevance, as insufficient intratumoral drug concentrations are considered to be a factor for resistance to gefitinib therapy. However, the highly nonspecific cellular binding of [(18)F]gefitinib may preclude the use of this imaging probe for noninvasive assessment of EGFR receptor status in patients.
PURPOSE:Gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK), has shown potent effects in a subset of patients carrying specific EGFR-TK mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In this study, we asked whether PET with [(18)F]gefitinib may be used to study noninvasively the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in vivo and to image the EGFR status of cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthesis of [(18)F]gefitinib has been previously described. The biodistribution and metabolic stability of [(18)F]gefitinib was assessed in mice and vervet monkeys for up to 2 h post injection by both micropositron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans and postmortem ex vivo tissue harvesting. Uptake levels of radiolabeled gefitinib in EGFR-expressing humancancer cell lines with various levels of EGFR expression or mutation status were evaluated both in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: MicroPET/CT scans in two species demonstrated a rapid and predominantly hepatobiliary clearance of [(18)F]gefitinib in vivo. However, uptake levels of radiolabeled gefitinib, both in vivo and in vitro, did not correlate with EGFR expression levels or functional status. This unexpected observation was due to high nonspecific, nonsaturable cellular uptake of gefitinib. CONCLUSION: The biodistribution of the drug analogue [(18)F]gefitinib suggests that it may be used to assess noninvasively the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in patients by PET imaging. This is of clinical relevance, as insufficient intratumoral drug concentrations are considered to be a factor for resistance to gefitinib therapy. However, the highly nonspecific cellular binding of [(18)F]gefitinib may preclude the use of this imaging probe for noninvasive assessment of EGFR receptor status in patients.
Authors: Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Joseph Amann; Shailaja Kalyankrishna; Pierre P Massion; Joyce E Ohm; Luc Girard; Hisayuki Shigematsu; Michael Peyton; Denise Juroske; Yuhui Huang; J Stuart Salmon; Young H Kim; Jonathan R Pollack; Kiyoshi Yanagisawa; Adi Gazdar; John D Minna; Jonathan M Kurie; David P Carbone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David McKillop; Elizabeth A Partridge; John V Kemp; Mike P Spence; Jane Kendrew; Sharon Barnett; Phillippa G Wood; Petrina B Giles; Andrew B Patterson; Francis Bichat; Nicolas Guilbaud; Trevor C Stephens Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Mark G Kris; Ronald B Natale; Roy S Herbst; Thomas J Lynch; Diane Prager; Chandra P Belani; Joan H Schiller; Karen Kelly; Harris Spiridonidis; Alan Sandler; Kathy S Albain; David Cella; Michael K Wolf; Steven D Averbuch; Judith J Ochs; Andrea C Kay Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M A Pantaleo; S Fanti; M Nannini; S Boschi; C Nanni; A Maleddu; D Rubello; G Biasco Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Brian Madajewski; Feng Chen; Barney Yoo; Melik Z Turker; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury; Cameron Brennan; Kai Ma; Li Zhang; Pei-Ming Chen; Rupa Juthani; Virginia Aragon-Sanabria; Mithat Gonen; Charles M Rudin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mei Tian; Kazuma Ogawa; Richard Wendt; Uday Mukhopadhyay; Julius Balatoni; Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Rajesh Uthamanthil; Agatha Borne; David Brammer; James Jackson; Osama Mawlawi; Bijun Yang; Mian M Alauddin; Juri G Gelovani Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Greg M Thurber; Thomas Reiner; Katherine S Yang; Rainer H Kohler; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Carlos Caicedo; Maria Jose Garcia-Velloso; Maria Dolores Lozano; Tania Labiano; Carmen Vigil Diaz; Jose Maria Lopez-Picazo; Alfonso Gurpide; Javier J Zulueta; Javier Zulueta; Jose Angel Richter Echevarria; Jose Luis Perez Gracia Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 9.236