Literature DB >> 18239740

Myocardial salvage in STEMI patients treated with primary coronary angioplasty as demonstrated by myocardial SPECT.

M J M Kurvers1, R L Braam, J F Verzijlbergen, A A C M Heestermans, J M Ten Berg.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID： 18239740      PMCID： PMC2213445          DOI： 10.1007/bf03086044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN： 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tareq Ibrahim; Hubertus P Bülow; Thomas Hackl; Mira Hörnke; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin Breuer; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Prognostic value of myocardial salvage achieved by reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gjin Ndrepepa; Julinda Mehilli; Markus Schwaiger; Helmut Schühlen; Stephan Nekolla; Stefan Martinoff; Claus Schmitt; Josef Dirschinger; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Infarct size after acute myocardial infarction measured by quantitative tomographic 99mTc sestamibi imaging predicts subsequent mortality.

Authors:  T D Miller; T F Christian; M R Hopfenspirger; D O Hodge; B J Gersh; R J Gibbons
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Gated myocardial SPECT imaging; true additional value in AMI?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of left ventricular function: visual or quantitative?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes; reliable by gated SPECT?

Authors:  E E van derWall; A J H A Scholte; H M Siebelink; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  CT perfusion angiography; beware of artifacts!

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J J Bax; J W Jukema; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.357
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.