Literature DB >> 18239340

Annual and weekly incidence rates of influenza and pediatric diseases estimated from infectious disease surveillance data in Japan, 2002-2005.

Miyuki Kawado1, Shuji Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Murakami, Michiko Izumida, Akiko Ohta, Yuki Tada, Mika Shigematsu, Yoshinori Yasui, Kiyosu Taniguchi, Masaki Nagai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The method for estimating incidence of infectious diseases from sentinel surveillance data has been proposed. In Japan, although the annual incidence rates of influenza and pediatric diseases estimated using the method were reported, their weekly incidence rates have not.
METHODS: The weekly sex- and age-specific numbers of cases in the sentinel medical institutions in the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Japan in 2002-2005 were used. Annual and weekly incidence rates of influenza and 12 pediatric diseases were estimated by the above-mentioned method, under the assumption that sentinels are randomly selected from all medical institutions.
RESULTS: The annual incidence rate of influenza in 2002-2005 was 57.7-142.6 per 1,000 population. The highest weekly incidence rate was 7.4 at week 8 in 2002, 14.9 at week 4 in 2003, 14.1 at week 5 in 2004, and 21.2 at week 9 in 2005. The annual incidence rate per 1,000 population of 0-14 years old in 2002-2005 was less than 5.0 for pertussis, rubella and measles, 293.2-320.8 for infectious gastroenteritis, and 5.3-89.6 for 8 other diseases. The highest weekly incidence rate was less than 1.0 for exanthem subitum, and was more than 5.0 for infectious gastroenteritis, hand-foot-mouth disease and herpangina.
CONCLUSION: We estimated annual and weekly incidence rates of influenza and pediatric diseases in Japan in 2002-2005, and described their temporal variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18239340      PMCID: PMC4809252          DOI: 10.2188/jea.17.s32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


In infectious diseases with large seasonal variation, such as influenza or measles, the annual and monthly or weekly incidence rate is essential for public health practice. The magnitude and temporal accumulation of such disease epidemics in a population, which would be important for planning control of epidemics, were observed in annual and monthly/weekly incidence rates. National infectious disease surveillance has been established in many countries.[1]-[8] The incidence rate of a targeted disease is obtained directly from the surveillance data completely covering its occurrence, but it is not calculated directly from the data of sentinel surveillance. A method for estimating incidence rate of infectious disease from sentinel surveillance data has been proposed.[9]-[12] In Japan, sentinel surveillance for influenza and pediatric diseases is conducted as a part of the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID).[13]-[15] The annual incidence rates of these diseases in 2002-2004 estimated from the sentinel surveillance data using the proposed method were reported,[16] but the weekly incidence rates are not yet clear. In the present study, we estimated annual and weekly incidence rates of influenza and pediatric diseases from the NESID data in Japan in 2002-2005, using the proposed method.

METHODS

Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Japan

General outline of the NESID in Japan has been described elsewhere.[13]-[15] Since 1999, the NESID has targeted influenza and 12 pediatric diseases (shown in Table 3) for sentinel surveillance. Local governments (prefectures) select sentinel medical institutions for influenza and pediatric diseases according to the NESID guidelines. The numbers of sentinels in the areas covered by pu lic health centers are approximately proportional to their population sizes. Each sentinel reports to a local public health center weekly. The report includes the sex- and age-specific numbers of cases newly diagnosed during a given week.
Table 3.

Estimated incidence rates of pediatric diseases in population aged 0-14 years, Japan, 2002-2005.

DiseaseYearEstimated incidenceIncidence rate (per 1,000 population aged 0-14 years)

Estimate95% confidence interval
Pharygoconjunctival fever200299,0005.54.6 - 6.5
2003256,00014.312.3 - 16.4
2004383,00021.418.6 - 24.1
2005397,00022.218.4 - 26.0
 
Group A streptococcal pharyngitis2002929,00051.947.2 - 56.5
2003995,00055.651.0 - 60.1
20041,244,00069.562.3 - 76.6
20051,192,00066.660.5 - 72.6
 
Infectious gastroenteritis20025,249,000293.1273.3 - 313.0
20035,405,000301.9280.1 - 323.6
20045,744,000320.8296.8 - 344.8
20055,639,000314.9293.7 - 336.2
 
Chickenpox20021,605,00089.685.1 - 94.2
20031,481,00082.778.1 - 87.3
20041,474,00082.377.9 - 86.7
20051,542,00086.181.8 - 90.4
 
Hand-foot-mouth disease2002570,00031.829.9 - 33.8
20031,027,00057.454.2 - 60.5
2004527,00029.427.3 - 31.6
2005657,00036.734.1 - 39.3
 
Erythema infectiosum2002369,00020.619.2 - 22.1
2003205,00011.410.6 - 12.3
2004308,00017.215.8 - 18.5
2005272,00015.213.9 - 16.6
 
Exanthem subitum2002687,00038.436.0 - 40.7
2003682,00038.135.6 - 40.5
2004685,00038.335.4 - 41.1
2005689,00038.536.0 - 41.0
 
Pertussis20029,0000.50.4 - 0.6
20038,0000.40.4 - 0.6
200412,0000.70.6 - 0.8
20059,0000.50.4 - 0.6
 
Rubella200218,0001.00.8 - 1.3
200317,0000.90.7 - 1.1
200430,0001.71.2 - 2.2
200510,0000.60.4 - 0.7
 
Herpangina2002695,00038.836.0 - 41.7
2003912,00050.947.3 - 54.5
2004659,00036.833.7 - 39.9
2005926,00051.747.8 - 55.6
 
Measles200272,0004.03.6 - 4.4
200348,0002.72.3 - 3.0
200410,0000.60.4 - 0.7
20056,0000.30.3 - 0.4
 
Mumps20021,045,00058.454.9 - 61.8
2003492,00027.525.6 - 29.4
2004789,00044.140.2 - 47.9
20051,308,00073.068.5 - 77.6

Surveillance Data and Method for Estimating Incidence

The data of sentinels' report of influenza and pediatric diseases from week 1 of 2002 through week 52 of 2005 in the NESID in Japan were used. The numbers of all medical institutions were obtained from the National Survey of Medical Care Institutions conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in October 2002.[17] The annual and weekly incidence was estimated using the method proposed by Hashimoto et al.[12] For each disease, prefecture and type of medical institution, the incidences in sentinels follow a multi-hypergeometric distribution under the fixed condition of the total number of sentinels under the assumption that sentinels are randomly selected from all medical institutions. The total incidence in each prefecture and type of medical institution were estimated as the total incidence in sentinels divided by the proportion of sentinels to all medical institutions. The total incidence in all medical institutions was estimated to be the total of those in all prefectures and types of medical institution. The approximate confidence interval for the incidence was given based on the distribution. The appendix shows the method for estimating incidences in detail. Types of medical institutions were classified using the information from the National Survey of Medical Care Institutions as follows; three types for pediatric diseases: "pediatric department in hospital," "clinic with pediatric department as its main department" and "clinic with pediatric department not as its main department." For influenza, the three types above were used plus "department of internal medicine in hospital, and clinic with internal medicine but without pediatric department." Table 1 shows the numbers of all and sentinel medical institutions by type of medical institution. The number of sentinels in 2002-2005 was about 4,700 for influenza and 3,100 for pediatric diseases. The proportion of sentinels in all medical institutions was 7.1% for influenza and 11.5-11.6% for pediatric diseases.
Table 1.

The number of all and sentinel medical institutions by type of medical institution, Japan, 2002-2005.

No. of allmedicalinstitutionsNo. of sentinel medical institutions (%)

2002200320042005
Influenza
 Total66,0144,659 (7.1)4,672 (7.1)4,679 (7.1)4,693 (7.1)
 Pediatric department in hospital2,859643 (22.5)656 (22.9)597 (20.9)592 (20.7)
 Clinic with pediatric department as its main department5,4831,816 (33.1)1,831 (33.4)1,838 (33.5)1,844 (33.6)
 Clinic with pediatric department not as its main department18,1561,093 (6.0)1,108 (6.1)1,103 (6.1)1,093 (6.0)
 Department of internal medicine in hospital, and clinic with internal medicine but without pediatric department39,5161,107 (2.8)1,077 (2.7)1,141 (2.9)1,164 (2.9)
Pediatric diseases
 Total26,4983,057 (11.5)3,077 (11.6)3,062 (11.6)3,086 (11.6)
 Pediatric department in hospital2,859737 (25.8)734 (25.7)733 (25.6)732 (25.6)
 Clinic with pediatric department as its main department5,4831,779 (32.4)1,804 (32.9)1,806 (32.9)1,810 (33.0)
 Clinic with pediatric department not as its main department18,156541 (3.0)539 (3.0)523 (2.9)544 (3.0)

The number of all medical institutions was obtained from the National Survey of Medical Care Institutions in 2002. Proportion of sentinel medical institutions in all medical institutions in parentheses.

The number of all medical institutions was obtained from the National Survey of Medical Care Institutions in 2002. Proportion of sentinel medical institutions in all medical institutions in parentheses.

Method of Analysis

Incidence rate per population was calculated using the incidence estimated above and the 2003 population in Japan. For influenza, the sex- and age-specific annual and weekly incidence rates were calculated. The proportion of weekly incidence to each influenza season's total incidence was presented by age group. Age groups were the following three; 0-14, 15-59, and 60 years old or over. In pediatric diseases, annual and weekly incidence rates were calculated for population aged 0-14 years.

RESULTS

Influenza

Table 2 shows the annual incidence rates of influenza by sex and age. The annual incidence rate per 1,000 population was 57.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.5-60.7) in 2002, 90.6 (95% CI: 86.7-94.4) in 2003, 70.1 (95% CI: 67.2-73.1) in 2004, and 142.6 (95% CI: 135.6-149.6) in 2005. The difference in incidence rates between male and female was not so large. The incidence rate in the 0-14 years age group was higher than in other age groups.
Table 2.

Estimated incidence rates of influenza by sex and age, Japan, 2002-2005.

YearSexAge (years)Estimated incidenceIncidence rate (per 1,000 population)

Estimate95% confidence interval
2002TotalTotal7,360,00057.754.5- 60.7
 
MaleTotal3,740,00060.056.8- 63.2
0-142,190,000238.7221.2- 256.1
15-601,420,00036.634.8- 38.4
60 and over130,0009.18.4- 9.8
 
FemaleTotal3,620,00055.452.4- 58.5
0-141,950,000223.4206.2- 239.4
15-601,510,00039.537.6- 41.6
60 and over160,0008.77.6- 9.3
 
2003TotalTotal11,560,00090.686.7- 94.4
 
MaleTotal5,800,00093.189.1- 97.1
0-143,160,000344.4324.8- 364.0
15-602,330,00060.056.9- 63.1
60 and over310,00021.721.0- 23.1
 
FemaleTotal5,760,00088.284.5- 91.9
0-142,820,000323.1304.7- 341.4
15-602,560,00066.963.8- 70.0
60 and over380,00020.719.6- 21.8
 
2004TotalTotal8,950,00070.167.2- 73.1
 
MaleTotal4,500,00072.269.2- 75.4
0-142,220,000241.9229.9- 252.8
15-602,040,00052.549.7- 55.3
60 and over250,00017.516.1- 18.9
 
FemaleTotal4,450,00068.165.2- 70.9
0-141,970,000225.7214.2- 237.1
15-602,160,00056.553.8- 59.3
60 and over310,00016.915.8- 18.0
 
2005TotalTotal18,200,000142.6135.6- 149.6
 
MaleTotal9,020,000144.8137.2- 152.2
0-144,500,000490.4465.3- 516.6
15-603,790,00097.690.1- 105.0
60 and over730,00051.146.2- 56.0
 
FemaleTotal9,180,000140.5134.0- 147.1
0-144,030,000461.7437.6- 484.6
15-604,260,000111.3104.6- 117.9
60 and over890,00048.644.2- 52.9
Figure 1 shows the weekly incidence rates of influenza. The highest weekly incidence rate per 1,000 population was 7.4 in week 8 of 2002, 14.9 in week 4 of 2003, 14.1 in week 5 of 2004, and 21.2 in week 9 of 2005. The period with an incidence rate of 1.0 or more was as follows: from week 3 to week 13 of 2002, from week 51 of 2002 to week 13 of 2003, from week 2 to week 11 of 2004, and from week 3 to week 17 of 2005.
Figure 1.

Estimated incidence rates of influenza by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 2 shows the proportion of weekly incidence in relation to each influenza season's total incidence by age. The peak week in the proportions in every age group was week 8 of 2002 in the 2001/2002 season and week 4 of 2003 in the 2002/2003 season. In the 2003/2004 season, the peak week was week 5 of 2004 in the aged 0-14 and 15-59 groups, and week 6-7 of 2004 in those aged 60 and over. In the 2004/2005 season, the peak week was week 8 in those aged 0-14, week 9 in those aged 15-59 and week 9-10 in those aged 60 and over.
Figure 2.

Proportion of weekly incidence in relation to each influenza season's total incidence by age group, Japan, 2002-2005.

Pediatric Diseases

Table 3 shows the incidence rates of pediatric diseases per 1,000 population among persons aged 0-14 years. The incidence rate in 2002-2005 was less than 5.0 for pertussis, rubella, and measles, 293.2-320.8 for infectious gastroenteritis, and 5.3-89.6 for other 8 diseases. Figures 3 to 11 shows the weekly incidence rates of 9 pediatric diseases per 1,000 population among those 0-14 years old, respectively. For pertussis, rubella, and measles, they were not shown because of their low annual incidence rates. The seasonal pattern was observed each year in many diseases. The highest weekly incidence rate in the four years was less than 1.0 for exanthem subitum (Figure 9), more than 5.0 for infectious gastroenteritis (Figure 5), hand-foot-mouth disease (Figure 7) and herpangina (Figure 10), and 1.0-5.0 in the other five diseases.
Figure 3.

Estimated incidence rates of pharygoconjunctival fever by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 11.

Estimated incidence rates of mumps by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 9.

Estimated incidence rates of exanthem subitum by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 5.

Estimated incidence rates of infectious gastroenteritis by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 7.

Estimated incidence rates of hand-foot-mouth disease by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

Figure 10.

Estimated incidence rates of herpangina by week, Japan, 2002-2005.

DISCUSSION

Large yearly and seasonal variation, small sex difference and age distribution with higher incidence rate in younger population were observed in the incidence rates of influenza. These results were similar to those in previous studies.[1]-[3] The highest weekly incidence rate in 2002-2005 was 7.4-21.2 per 1,000 population. This would provide useful information for preventive countermeasures against the epidemic spread of influenza. The week with the highest weekly incidence rate in the over-sixties bracket was later than that in the 0-14 years of age bracket in 2004 and 2005, while such a phenomenon was not observed in 2002 and 2003. This finding would be related to several factors such as combination of epidemics of different virus types, its difference between years, proportion of persons with susceptibility to the virus, its difference between younger and older population.[18] The incidence rate in the population aged 0-14 years in 2002-2005 was low in pertussis, rubella, and measles, presumably due to the association with the vaccination program against these diseases in Japan.[19],[20] Some seasonal patterns were observed in many pediatric diseases as shown in Figures 3 to 11. These results were obtained in other previous reports.[4]-[6] The highest weekly incidence rate per 1,000 population aged 0-14 years in 2002-2005 was less than 1.0 for exanthem subitum. It is related to little seasonal variation. The rate was more than 5.0 for infectious gastroenteritis, hand-foot-mouth disease and herpangina. This is related to the high incidence rate of infectious gastroenteritis, and the large seasonal variation in hand-foot-mouth disease and herpangina. This finding means that the epidemic of these three diseases spread rapidly, and would be important for planning control of their epidemics. There are some limitations and problems in the present study. The main problems would be in the data and method for estimating the incidence. Problems with the data in the reports to the NESID in Japan include the inaccuracy of disease diagnosis and incompleteness of reporting.[13] Those in the method have been already discussed in the previous reports in detail.[12],[16] The assumption in the method that sentinels are randomly selected from all medical institutions is critical. Although the NESID guidelines in Japan calls for the sentinels to be selected from all medical institutions in public health areas as randomly and as representatively as possible, sentinels seem to be recruited on a voluntary basis to some extent. It was reported that the mean size of the underlying population was larger in sentinels than in all medical institutions, that the incidence was overestimated because the assumption was failing, and that the ratio of the estimated to the actual incidence of influenza and pediatric diseases based on the sentinel surveillance data in the NESID in Japan would be 1.06-1.26.[12] In conclusion, we estimated the annual and weekly incidence rates of influenza and pediatric diseases in Japan in 2002-2005, and described their temporal variation.
  18 in total

1.  Population estimates of persons presenting to general practitioners with influenza-like illness, 1987-96: a study of the demography of influenza-like illness in sentinel practice networks in England and Wales, and in The Netherlands.

Authors:  D M Fleming; M Zambon; A I Bartelds
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Annual incidence rate of infectious diseases estimated from sentinel surveillance data in Japan.

Authors:  Shuji Hashimoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Kiyosu Taniguchi; Nahoko Shindo; Ken Osaka; Hiroshi Fuchigami; Masaki Nagai
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.211

3.  The surveillance of infectious diseases.

Authors:  S B Thacker; K Choi; P S Brachman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The changing age and seasonal profile of pertussis in Canada.

Authors:  Danuta M Skowronski; Gaston De Serres; Diane MacDonald; Wrency Wu; Carol Shaw; Jane Macnabb; Sylvie Champagne; David M Patrick; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Surveillance system of infectious diseases in Japan.

Authors:  H Ohshiro; K Kawamoto; T Nose
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Epidemiology of chickenpox in France (1991-1995).

Authors:  S Deguen; N P Chau; A Flahault
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Surveillance of influenza-like illness in France. The example of the 1995/1996 epidemic.

Authors:  F Carrat; A Flahault; E Boussard; N Farran; L Dangoumau; A J Valleron
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Incidence patterns of respiratory illness in Queensland estimated from sentinel general practice.

Authors:  C Del Mar; D Pincus
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04

9.  Bias of vaccination coverage in a household questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Shuji Hashimoto; Miyuki Kawado; Rumi Seko; Masahiro Kato; Nobuhiko Okabe
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Kiyosu Taniguchi; Shuji Hashimoto; Miyuki Kawado; Yoshitaka Murakami; Michiko Izumida; Akiko Ohta; Yuki Tada; Mika Shigematsu; Yoshinori Yasui; Masaki Nagai
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genetic variation in chromosome Y regulates susceptibility to influenza A virus infection.

Authors:  Dimitry N Krementsov; Laure K Case; Oliver Dienz; Abbas Raza; Qian Fang; Jennifer L Ather; Matthew E Poynter; Jonathan E Boyson; Janice Y Bunn; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Latitude-based approach for detecting aberrations of hand, foot, and mouth disease epidemics.

Authors:  Jia-Hong Tang; Ta-Chien Chan; Mika Shigematsu; Jing-Shiang Hwang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Geographical spread of influenza incidence in Spain during the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic wave and the two succeeding influenza seasons.

Authors:  D Gomez-Barroso; M A Martinez-Beneito; V Flores; R Amorós; C Delgado; P Botella; O Zurriaga; A Larrauri
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Estimated Number of Patients with Influenza A(H1)pdm09, or Other Viral Types, from 2010 to 2014 in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Murakami; Shuji Hashimoto; Miyuki Kawado; Akiko Ohta; Kiyosu Taniguchi; Tomimasa Sunagawa; Tamano Matsui; Masaki Nagai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Epidemiology of influenza-like illness in the Amazon Basin of Peru, 2008-2009.

Authors:  Brett M Forshey; Victor A Laguna-Torres; Stalin Vilcarromero; Isabel Bazan; Claudio Rocha; Amy C Morrison; Steven T Stoddard; Yuri Alegre; Jorge Gomez; Thomas W Scott; Tadeusz J Kochel
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Population based hospitalization burden of laboratory-confirmed hand, foot and mouth disease caused by multiple enterovirus serotypes in Southern China.

Authors:  Shuanbao Yu; Qiaohong Liao; Yonghong Zhou; Shixiong Hu; Qi Chen; Kaiwei Luo; Zhenhua Chen; Li Luo; Wei Huang; Bingbing Dai; Min He; Fengfeng Liu; Qi Qiu; Lingshuang Ren; H Rogier van Doorn; Hongjie Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating nationwide cases of sexually transmitted diseases in 2015 from sentinel surveillance data in Japan.

Authors:  Miyuki Kawado; Shuji Hashimoto; Akiko Ohta; Mari S Oba; Ritei Uehara; Kiyosu Taniguchi; Tomimasa Sunagawa; Masaki Nagai; Yoshitaka Murakami
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Age-specific sex-related differences in infections: a statistical analysis of national surveillance data in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuoki Eshima; Osamu Tokumaru; Shohei Hara; Kira Bacal; Seigo Korematsu; Shigeru Karukaya; Kiyo Uruma; Nobuhiko Okabe; Toyojiro Matsuishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Number of sentinel medical institutions needed for estimating prefectural incidence in influenza surveillance in Japan.

Authors:  Shuji Hashimoto; Miyuki Kawado; Yoshitaka Murakami; Akiko Ohta; Mika Shigematsu; Yuki Tada; Kiyosu Taniguchi; Masaki Nagai
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Differential Redox State Contributes to Sex Disparities in the Response to Influenza Virus Infection in Male and Female Mice.

Authors:  Ignacio Celestino; Paola Checconi; Donatella Amatore; Marta De Angelis; Paolo Coluccio; Rosanna Dattilo; Danilo Alunni Fegatelli; Ann Maria Clemente; Paola Matarrese; Maria Gabriella Torcia; Romina Mancinelli; Caterina Loredana Mammola; Enrico Garaci; Anna Rita Vestri; Walter Malorni; Anna Teresa Palamara; Lucia Nencioni
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.