Literature DB >> 18238991

ACOG committee opinion number 399, February 2008: umbilical cord blood banking.

.   

Abstract

Two types of banks have emerged for the collection and storage of umbilical cord blood--public banks and private banks. Public banks promote allogenic (related or unrelated) donation, analogous to the current collection of whole blood units in the United States. Private banks were initially developed to store stem cells from umbilical cord blood for autologous use (taken from an individual for subsequent use by the same individual) by a child if the child develops disease later in life. If a patient requests information on umbilical cord blood banking, balanced and accurate information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of public versus private banking should be provided. The remote chance of an autologous unit of umbilical cord blood being used for a child or a family member (approximately 1 in 2,700 individuals) should be disclosed. The collection should not alter routine practice for the timing of umbilical cord clamping. Physicians or other professionals who recruit pregnant women and their families for for-profit umbilical cord blood banking should disclose any financial interests or other potential conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18238991     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318166603c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Umbilical cord blood: information for childbirth educators.

Authors:  Renece Waller-Wise
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2011

2.  Delayed cord clamping: are we ready to listen to the doctor from 1796?

Authors:  G T Mandy
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Cord Blood Banking for Potential Future Transplantation.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Bertram H Lubin; Mitchell S Cairo; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Umbilical cord blood processing using Prepacyte-CB increases haematopoietic progenitor cell availability over conventional Hetastarch separation.

Authors:  C Basford; N Forraz; S Habibollah; K Hanger; C P McGuckin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  US public cord blood banking practices: recruitment, donation, and the timing of consent.

Authors:  Sherri M Broder; Roselle S Ponsaran; Aaron J Goldenberg
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  The cord blood separation league table: a comparison of the major clinical grade harvesting techniques for cord blood stem cells.

Authors:  Christina Basford; Nicolas Forraz; Saba Habibollah; Kendal Hanger; Colin McGuckin
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 7.  Optimal timing for clamping the umbilical cord after birth.

Authors:  Tonse N K Raju; Nalini Singhal
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 8.  Stem cells derived from cord blood in transplantation and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Verena Reimann; Ursula Creutzig; Gesine Kögler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Umbilical cord blood transplant for malignancies: a hope or hype.

Authors:  Ankur Bahl; Sameer Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Banking Umbilical Cord Blood (UCB) Stem Cells: Awareness, Attitude and Expectations of Potential Donors from One of the Largest Potential Repository (India).

Authors:  Deeksha Pandey; Simar Kaur; Asha Kamath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.