OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral and transdermal contraceptives containing similar hormone formulations on vascular risk markers. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, investigator-blinded, crossover, clinical trial with 24 healthy women, aged 18-35 years, who received 2 months oftransdermal or oral contraceptive, 2 months washout, then 2 months of the alternative medication. The transdermal contraceptive contained 0.75 mg ethinyl estradiol and 6 mg norelgestromin. The oral contraceptive contained 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 250 mcg norgestimate. Blood samples taken before and after each treatment were analyzed in batch for D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, total and free protein S, antithrombin, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) determined with two thrombin generation-based assays, the alpha2macroglobulin-thrombin end point method (alpha2M-IIa) and calibrated automated thrombinography. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis. RESULTS: For both contraceptives (transdermal, oral) there were significant declines in free (19%, 11%) and total protein S (19%, 13%) and antithrombin (13%, 10%); increases in fibrinogen (8%, 10%), C-reactive protein (220%, 292%), nAPCsr alpha2M-IIa (81%, 61%), and nAPCsr calibrated automated thrombinography (102%, 68%), all P<.05. Transdermal contraceptives had a greater effect than oral contraceptives on free protein S (P=.07), nAPCsr alpha2M-IIa (P=.06), and nAPCsr calibrated automated thrombinography (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Oral and transdermal contraception with similar hormones had similar adverse effects on vascular risk markers. This suggests that this transdermal contraceptive has at least a similar thrombosis risk as its oral counterpart. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00554632 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral and transdermal contraceptives containing similar hormone formulations on vascular risk markers. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, investigator-blinded, crossover, clinical trial with 24 healthy women, aged 18-35 years, who received 2 months of transdermal or oral contraceptive, 2 months washout, then 2 months of the alternative medication. The transdermal contraceptive contained 0.75 mg ethinyl estradiol and 6 mg norelgestromin. The oral contraceptive contained 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 250 mcg norgestimate. Blood samples taken before and after each treatment were analyzed in batch for D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, total and free protein S, antithrombin, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) determined with two thrombin generation-based assays, the alpha2macroglobulin-thrombin end point method (alpha2M-IIa) and calibrated automated thrombinography. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis. RESULTS: For both contraceptives (transdermal, oral) there were significant declines in free (19%, 11%) and total protein S (19%, 13%) and antithrombin (13%, 10%); increases in fibrinogen (8%, 10%), C-reactive protein (220%, 292%), nAPCsr alpha2M-IIa (81%, 61%), and nAPCsr calibrated automated thrombinography (102%, 68%), all P<.05. Transdermal contraceptives had a greater effect than oral contraceptives on free protein S (P=.07), nAPCsr alpha2M-IIa (P=.06), and nAPCsr calibrated automated thrombinography (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Oral and transdermal contraception with similar hormones had similar adverse effects on vascular risk markers. This suggests that this transdermal contraceptive has at least a similar thrombosis risk as its oral counterpart. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00554632 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Elizabeth M Kiefer; Qiuhu Shi; Donald R Hoover; Robert Kaplan; Russell Tracy; Michael Augenbraun; Chenglong Liu; Marek Nowicki; Phyllis C Tien; Mardge Cohen; Elizabeth T Golub; Kathryn Anastos Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jeffrey T Jensen; Anne E Burke; Kurt T Barnhart; Carrie Tillotson; Marci Messerle-Forbes; Dawn Peters Journal: Contraception Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Ulla M Ågren; Marjatta Anttila; Kristiina Mäenpää-Liukko; Maija-Liisa Rantala; Hilkka Rautiainen; Werner F Sommer; Ellen Mommers Journal: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Lyle G Best; Kari E North; Xia Li; Vittorio Palmieri; Jason G Umans; Jean MacCluer; Sandy Laston; Karin Haack; Harald Goring; Vincent P Diego; Laura Almasy; Elisa T Lee; Russell P Tracy; Shelley Cole Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Jesus Hernandez-Juarez; Ethel A Garcia-Latorre; Manuel Moreno-Hernandez; Jose Fernando Moran-Perez; Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Escobedo; Gerardo Cogque-Hernandez; Rubén Julián-Nacer; Xochitl Hernandez-Giron; Rosalia Palafox-Gomez; Irma Isordia-Salas; Abraham Majluf-Cruz Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 3.223