Literature DB >> 18237964

An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration.

Mário A T Figueiredo1, Robert D Nowak.   

Abstract

This paper introduces an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for image restoration (deconvolution) based on a penalized likelihood formulated in the wavelet domain. Regularization is achieved by promoting a reconstruction with low-complexity, expressed in the wavelet coefficients, taking advantage of the well known sparsity of wavelet representations. Previous works have investigated wavelet-based restoration but, except for certain special cases, the resulting criteria are solved approximately or require demanding optimization methods. The EM algorithm herein proposed combines the efficient image representation offered by the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with the diagonalization of the convolution operator obtained in the Fourier domain. Thus, it is a general-purpose approach to wavelet-based image restoration with computational complexity comparable to that of standard wavelet denoising schemes or of frequency domain deconvolution methods. The algorithm alternates between an E-step based on the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and a DWT-based M-step, resulting in an efficient iterative process requiring O(N log N) operations per iteration. The convergence behavior of the algorithm is investigated, and it is shown that under mild conditions the algorithm converges to a globally optimal restoration. Moreover, our new approach performs competitively with, in some cases better than, the best existing methods in benchmark tests.

Year:  2003        PMID: 18237964     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2003.814255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  31 in total

1.  Regularization parameter selection for nonlinear iterative image restoration and MRI reconstruction using GCV and SURE-based methods.

Authors:  Sathish Ramani; Zhihao Liu; Jeffrey Rosen; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Localized spatio-temporal constraints for accelerated CMR perfusion.

Authors:  Mehmet Akçakaya; Tamer A Basha; Silvio Pflugi; Murilo Foppa; Kraig V Kissinger; Thomas H Hauser; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A Compressed-Sensing Based Blind Deconvolution Method for Image Deblurring in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  K S Kim; S Y Kang; C K Park; G A Kim; S Y Park; Hyosung Cho; C W Seo; D Y Lee; H W Lim; H W Lee; J E Park; T H Woo; J E Oh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Accelerating multi-echo water-fat MRI with a joint locally low-rank and spatial sparsity-promoting reconstruction.

Authors:  Felix Lugauer; Dominik Nickel; Jens Wetzl; Berthold Kiefer; Joachim Hornegger; Andreas Maier
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  High-Resolution Oscillating Steady-State fMRI Using Patch-Tensor Low-Rank Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shouchang Guo; Jeffrey A Fessler; Douglas C Noll
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A soft-threshold filtering approach for reconstruction from a limited number of projections.

Authors:  Hengyong Yu; Ge Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Spatially regularized compressed sensing for high angular resolution diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Oleg Michailovich; Yogesh Rathi; Sudipto Dolui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Accelerated edge-preserving image restoration without boundary artifacts.

Authors:  Antonios Matakos; Sathish Ramani; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 10.856

9.  Space-time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography.

Authors:  Andrew Bolstad; Barry Van Veen; Robert Nowak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Deconvolution When Classifying Noisy Data Involving Transformations.

Authors:  Raymond Carroll; Aurore Delaigle; Peter Hall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.