Literature DB >> 18237832

Skin sensitization in chemical risk assessment: report of a WHO/IPCS international workshop focusing on dose-response assessment.

Henk van Loveren1, Amanda Cockshott, Tom Gebel, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Wim H de Jong, Joanna Matheson, Helen McGarry, Laurence Musset, Maryjane K Selgrade, Carolyn Vickers.   

Abstract

An international workshop was held in 2006 to evaluate experimental techniques for hazard identification and hazard characterization of sensitizing agents in terms of their ability to produce data, including dose-response information, to inform risk assessment. Human testing to identify skin sensitizers is discouraged for ethical reasons. Animal-free alternatives, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches, have not been sufficiently developed for such application. Guinea pig tests do not generally include dose-response assessment and are therefore not designed for the assessment of potency, defined as the relative ability of a chemical to induce sensitization in a previously naive individual. In contrast, the mouse local lymph node assay does include dose-response assessment and is appropriate for this purpose. Epidemiological evidence can be used only under certain circumstances for the evaluation of the sensitizing potency of chemicals, as it reflects degree of exposure as well as intrinsic potency. Nevertheless, human diagnostic patch test data and quantitative elicitation data have provided very important information in reducing allergic contact dermatitis risk and sensitization in the general population. It is therefore recommended that clinical data, particularly dose-response data derived from sensitized patients, be included in risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18237832     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  Detection of hazardous pollutants in chrome-tanned leather using locally developed laser-induced breakdown spectrometer.

Authors:  M M Nasr; Mohammed Asharf Gondal; Z S Seddigi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; James Truax; Marco Corvaro; Raja Settivari; Joseph Henriquez; Jeremy McFadden; Travis Gulledge; Victor Johnson; Sean Gehen; Dori Germolec; David G Allen; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Nano-titanium dioxide modulates the dermal sensitization potency of DNCB.

Authors:  Salik Hussain; Stijn Smulders; Vanessa De Vooght; Bert Ectors; Sonja Boland; Francelyne Marano; Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Benoit Nemery; Peter H M Hoet; Jeroen A J Vanoirbeek
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  A direct peptide reactivity assay using a high-throughput mass spectrometry screening platform for detection of skin sensitizers.

Authors:  Zhengxi Wei; Yuhong Fang; Maya L Gosztyla; Andrew J Li; Wenwei Huang; Christopher A LeClair; Anton Simeonov; Dingyin Tao; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 4.271

Review 7.  Allergic Responses Induced by the Immunomodulatory Effects of Nanomaterials upon Skin Exposure.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka; Etsushi Kuroda; Toshiro Hirai; Yasuo Tsutsumi; Ken J Ishii
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.