Literature DB >> 18237780

Preen oil as the main source of external contamination with organic pollutants onto feathers of the common magpie (Pica pica).

Veerle L B Jaspers1, Adrian Covaci, Pieter Deleu, Hugo Neels, Marcel Eens.   

Abstract

We investigated the possible sources of contamination with organic pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), p,p'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and metabolites, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), in and onto tail feathers of a large songbird, the common magpie (Pica pica). Although feathers are potentially useful as a non-destructive biomonitor for organic pollutants, concentrations may be influenced by external contamination onto the feather surface. In a first approach, a group of magpies was captured after the completion of moult. The third tail feather was pulled out and a blood sample was taken. Most PCBs, DDTs and some PBDEs could be quantified in one single tail feather, indicating that the applicability of feathers goes beyond monitoring with predatory birds, as shown previously. Nevertheless, correlations between levels in serum and feathers were found significant in three cases only (i.e. CB 170, CB 180 and CB 187). This finding may be attributed to different factors, such as varying diet, condition, sample size or external contamination. In a second approach, cadavers of magpies were collected throughout Flanders. The preen gland was removed and the first, third and fifth tail feathers were pulled out at both sides. No significant differences were found among tail feathers within an individual. We compared three washing procedures to remove external contamination with organic pollutants from these feathers: deionised water, acetone and a surfactant/acetone solution. Right feathers were washed and left feathers were kept as control. Concentrations in the resulting washes were found highest in the acetone solutions. Furthermore, feathers washed with acetone or with a surfactant/acetone solution had significantly lower mean concentrations than the control feathers. Highest correlations with levels in preen gland were obtained for the control feathers. Consequently, the source of external contamination with organic pollutants onto feathers seems to be endogenous, originating from the preen gland. This is in great contrast to the extensive airborne pollution that has been reported for most heavy metals. In summary, the results of the current study highlight the usefulness of feathers for non-destructive biomonitoring of organic pollutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18237780     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  9 in total

1.  Contrasting congener profiles for persistent organic pollutants and PAH monitoring in European storm petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus) breeding in Ireland: a preen oil versus feathers approach.

Authors:  Heidi Acampora; Philip White; Olga Lyashevska; Ian O'Connor
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Quantitation of neonicotinoid insecticides, plus qualitative screening for other xenobiotics, in small-mass avian tissue samples using UHPLC high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Michael S Filigenzi; Emily E Graves; Lisa A Tell; Karen A Jelks; Robert H Poppenga
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  Feathers as bioindicators of PCB exposure in clapper rails.

Authors:  J W Summers; K F Gaines; N Garvin; W L Stephens; J C Cumbee; G L Mills
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Presence of persistent organic pollutants in a breeding common tern (Sterna hirundo) population in Ireland.

Authors:  Heidi Acampora; Philip White; Olga Lyashevska; Ian O'Connor
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Razorbill (Alca torda) feathers as an alternative tool for evaluating exposure to organochlorine pesticides.

Authors:  Silvia Espín; Emma Martínez-López; Pedro María-Mojica; Antonio J García-Fernández
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 6.  Is current information on organochlorine exposure sufficient to conserve birds in India?

Authors:  Arzoo Malik; Nishith Dharaiya; Silvia Espín
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Tracking pan-continental trends in environmental contamination using sentinel raptors-what types of samples should we use?

Authors:  S Espín; A J García-Fernández; D Herzke; R F Shore; B van Hattum; E Martínez-López; M Coeurdassier; I Eulaers; C Fritsch; P Gómez-Ramírez; V L B Jaspers; O Krone; G Duke; B Helander; R Mateo; P Movalli; C Sonne; N W van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Human Hair, Baltic Grey Seal (Halichoerus grypus) Fur and Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) Feathers as Accumulators of Bisphenol A and Alkylphenols.

Authors:  Iga Nehring; Marta Staniszewska; Lucyna Falkowska
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Validating the use of intrinsic markers in body feathers to identify inter-individual differences in non-breeding areas of northern fulmars.

Authors:  Lucy R Quinn; Andrew A Meharg; Jan A van Franeker; Isla M Graham; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.