CONTEXT: Health care disparities are well documented for people living in rural areas and for people who are members of ethnic minorities. PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine whether providers report greater difficulty in providing care for rural than urban residents and for ethnic minorities than patients/clients in general in 4 practice areas of ethical relevance: attaining treatment adherence, assuring confidentiality, establishing therapeutic alliance, and engaging in informed consent processes. METHODS: We received survey responses from 1,558 multidisciplinary medical and behavioral providers across rural and non-rural areas of New Mexico and Alaska in 2004 to assess a wide range of issues in providing health care. FINDINGS: Providers reported some difficulties in fulfilling various ethical practices for all types of patients, but not more difficulty when caring for minority compared to nonminority patients/clients. However, they do report more frequent additional problems related to the practice issues of treatment adherence, therapeutic alliance, informed consent, and confidentiality with minority patients than others. Difficulties and more frequent additional problems are greater for providers in rural than in non-rural areas. Results generalize across both Alaska and New Mexico with few differences. CONCLUSIONS: We obtained evidence for disparity in care for patients/ clients who were minority group members, and clear evidence of disparity for people residing in rural compared to non-rural areas of 2 states with large rural areas.
CONTEXT: Health care disparities are well documented for people living in rural areas and for people who are members of ethnic minorities. PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine whether providers report greater difficulty in providing care for rural than urban residents and for ethnic minorities than patients/clients in general in 4 practice areas of ethical relevance: attaining treatment adherence, assuring confidentiality, establishing therapeutic alliance, and engaging in informed consent processes. METHODS: We received survey responses from 1,558 multidisciplinary medical and behavioral providers across rural and non-rural areas of New Mexico and Alaska in 2004 to assess a wide range of issues in providing health care. FINDINGS: Providers reported some difficulties in fulfilling various ethical practices for all types of patients, but not more difficulty when caring for minority compared to nonminority patients/clients. However, they do report more frequent additional problems related to the practice issues of treatment adherence, therapeutic alliance, informed consent, and confidentiality with minority patients than others. Difficulties and more frequent additional problems are greater for providers in rural than in non-rural areas. Results generalize across both Alaska and New Mexico with few differences. CONCLUSIONS: We obtained evidence for disparity in care for patients/ clients who were minority group members, and clear evidence of disparity for people residing in rural compared to non-rural areas of 2 states with large rural areas.
Authors: Ronnie D Horner; William Salazar; H Jack Geiger; Kim Bullock; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Martha Cornog; Glenn Flores Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Tedd V Ellerbrock; Sandra Chamblee; Timothy J Bush; Johnny W Johnson; Bryan J Marsh; Pam Lowell; Robert J Trenschel; C Fordham Von Reyn; Linda S Johnson; C Robert Horsburgh Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Cody Chipp; Sarah Dewane; Christiane Brems; Mark E Johnson; Teddy D Warner; Laura W Roberts Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.333