Literature DB >> 18236934

Randomized controlled trials in environmental health research: ethical issues.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are becoming increasingly common in environmental health research. Like all studies involving human subjects, environmental health RCTs raise many ethical challenges, ranging from obtaining informed consent to minimizing risks to protecting privacy and confidentiality. One of the most important issues raised by these studies is whether it is ethical to withhold effective environmental health interventions from research subjects in order to satisfy scientific objectives. Although environmental health investigators usually do not have professional obligations to provide medical care to research subjects, they have ethical obligations to avoid exploiting them. Withholding interventions from research subjects can be ethical, provided that it does not lead to exploitation of individuals or groups. To avoid exploiting individuals or groups, investigators should ensure that research subjects and study populations receive a fair share of the benefits of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18236934      PMCID: PMC2653276     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  11 in total

1.  The ethics of placebo-controlled trials--a middle ground.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; F G Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Placebo-controlled trials and the logic of clinical purpose.

Authors:  Benjamin Freedman
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

3.  Ethics. Fair benefits for research in developing countries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Howard Brody
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Research on environmental health interventions: ethical problems and solutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Darryl C Zeldin; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  The clinical investigator as fiduciary: discarding a misguided idea.

Authors:  E Haavi Morreim
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions.

Authors:  David R Buchanan; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.

Authors:  M Spriggs
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Exploitation in biomedical research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

10.  Reduction in asthma morbidity in children as a result of home remediation aimed at moisture sources.

Authors:  Carolyn M Kercsmar; Dorr G Dearborn; Mark Schluchter; Lintong Xue; H Lester Kirchner; John Sobolewski; Stuart J Greenberg; Stephen J Vesper; Terry Allan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Environmental Health Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2008-07-14

2.  Municipal bylaw to reduce cosmetic/non-essential pesticide use on household lawns - a policy implementation evaluation.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Loren Vanderlinden; Jessica Leah; Rich Whate; Carol Mee; Monica Bienefeld; Susitha Wanigaratne; Monica Campbell
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Randomized controlled trials in environmental health research: unethical or underutilized?

Authors:  Ryan W Allen; Prabjit K Barn; Bruce P Lanphear
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Measuring and Reducing Chemical Spills by Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Providing Feedback.

Authors:  Aimilia M Tsokou; Alix Howells; Moray S Stark
Journal:  J Chem Educ       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  A Bogdanovic; P Bulajic; D Masulovic; N Bidzic; M Zivanovic; D Galun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Invited Perspective: A Critical Part of a Real-World Environmental Health Trial Is to Demonstrate That the Intervention Reduced Exposure.

Authors:  Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 11.035

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.