Literature DB >> 18236644

How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations.

Bruce A Schneider1, Liang Li, Meredyth Daneman.   

Abstract

Listeners often complain that they have trouble following a conversation when the environment is noisy. The environment could be noisy because of the presence of other unrelated but meaningful conversations, or because of the presence of less meaningful sound sources such as ventilation noise. Both kinds of distracting sound sources produce interference at the auditory periphery (activate similar regions along the basilar membrane), and this kind of interference is called "energetic masking". However, in addition to energetic masking, meaningful sound sources, such as competing speech, can and do interfere with the processing of the target speech at more central levels (phonetic and/or semantic), and this kind of interference is often called informational masking. In this article we review what is known about informational masking of speech by competing speech, and the auditory and cognitive factors that determine its severity.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18236644     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  32 in total

1.  Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Brent Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Kristin Van Engen; Sandra Hale; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Negative emotions in the target speaker's voice enhance speech recognition under "cocktail-party" environments.

Authors:  Lingxi Lu; Yu Ding; Chuanwei Xue; Liang Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Sensation and Psychiatry: Linking Age-Related Hearing Loss to Late-Life Depression and Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Katharine Brewster; Justin S Golub; Ana H Kim; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; James Dewey; Lesli A Guthrie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Normal adult aging and the contextual influences affecting speech and meaningful sound perception.

Authors:  Jennifer Aydelott; Robert Leech; Jennifer Crinion
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-02-08

6.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Julie I Cohen; Christopher Waldroup
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

9.  Precedence-effect-induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition in socially reared but not isolation-reared rats.

Authors:  Yi Du; Jingyu Li; Xihong Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.