BACKGROUND: Many U.K. medical schools have patient contact in the first two years of the undergraduate course. AIM: To compare the purposes and organization of early patient contact in UK medical schools and to relate these arrangements to the schools' curricular objectives. METHODS: A telephone survey of lead educators in UK medical schools. Categories of contact were plotted against phases of the course to discern patterns of organisation. RESULTS: The quantity of contact varies considerably (four to 65 days). There is a pattern, with learning objectives around the social context of health and illness preceding skills based work and integrated clinical knowledge for practice coming later. Schools fall into three categories: close adherence to the preclinical/clinical split, with limited early contact acting as an introduction to social aspects of health; provision of substantial patient contact to maximize the integration of knowledge and skills; and transitional, with limited clinical goals. General practice provides between one third and one half of early patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: Arrangements meet the objectives set by each school and reflect differing educational philosophies. Change is toward more early contact. There appears to be no national guidance which supports a minimum quantity of patient contact or specific educational purpose in the early years of U.K. basic medical training.
BACKGROUND: Many U.K. medical schools have patient contact in the first two years of the undergraduate course. AIM: To compare the purposes and organization of early patient contact in UK medical schools and to relate these arrangements to the schools' curricular objectives. METHODS: A telephone survey of lead educators in UK medical schools. Categories of contact were plotted against phases of the course to discern patterns of organisation. RESULTS: The quantity of contact varies considerably (four to 65 days). There is a pattern, with learning objectives around the social context of health and illness preceding skills based work and integrated clinical knowledge for practice coming later. Schools fall into three categories: close adherence to the preclinical/clinical split, with limited early contact acting as an introduction to social aspects of health; provision of substantial patient contact to maximize the integration of knowledge and skills; and transitional, with limited clinical goals. General practice provides between one third and one half of early patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: Arrangements meet the objectives set by each school and reflect differing educational philosophies. Change is toward more early contact. There appears to be no national guidance which supports a minimum quantity of patient contact or specific educational purpose in the early years of U.K. basic medical training.
Authors: Julie M Cavallario; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Johanna M Hoch; Matthew Hoch; Sarah A Manspeaker; Shana L Pribesh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Cailee E Welch Bacon; Julie M Cavallario; Stacy E Walker; R Curtis Bay; Bonnie L Van Lunen Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 3.824
Authors: Marjorie D Wenrich; Molly B Jackson; Ineke Wolfhagen; Paul G Ramsey; Albert J J Scherpbier Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 2.463