| Literature DB >> 18236144 |
Michelle R Blunt1, Hunter A McAllister.
Abstract
This research tested whether mug book size moderates mug shot exposure effects. Witnesses to a simulated theft searched either a small, a large, or no mug book, followed by a perpetrator-absent lineup containing a critical foil from the mug book. Contrary to predictions of a transference effect, critical foil lineup identifications did not differ across conditions. To test for a commitment effect, only participants who selected the critical foil in the mug book were considered; there was evidence of a commitment effect in the large mug book condition. Finally, there were more lineup-correct rejections in the large mug book condition; this was explained in terms of the criterion for making mug book choices carrying over to lineup choices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18236144 DOI: 10.1007/s10979-008-9126-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Law Hum Behav ISSN: 0147-7307