Literature DB >> 18236050

Modified osteoplastic orbitozygomatic craniotomy in the pediatric population.

Matthew L Miller1, Bruce A Kaufman, Sean M Lew.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Anterior and anterolateral skull base approaches offer the advantages of improved visualization and minimal brain retraction for lesions involving the orbital apex, parasellar regions, and anterior and middle fossa floors. These approaches are seldom used in the pediatric population due to the perceived increase in morbidity and surgical complexity. We report the application of the previously described modified osteoplastic orbitozygomatic (OZ) craniotomy to pediatric neurosurgical cases. This approach offers a number of advantages and is technically straightforward.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results from six pediatric cases are reported. Age ranged from 26 months to 15 years, with a follow-up period of 5 to 22 months. Pathology included craniopharyngioma (three), frontal epidural abscess-subdural empyema with intraorbital extension (one), hypothalamic hamartoma (one), and optic pathway glioma (one). No complications related to the surgical approach were noted. In all cases, good postoperative cosmesis was achieved with excellent realignment of the orbital rim. Temporalis muscle bulk was preserved and symmetric in all cases.
CONCLUSION: The modified osteoplastic OZ craniotomy can be safely and effectively applied to the pediatric population. Advantages include: (1) ease of use; (2) superior exposure and therefore less brain retraction; (3) an easily replaced one-piece bone flap which obviates the need for plating-suturing at the orbital rim; (4) a vascularized bone flap less susceptible to infection; and (5) maintenance of normal temporalis muscle anatomy for improved cosmesis and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18236050     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-007-0575-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  11 in total

1.  Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach.

Authors:  M S Schwartz; G J Anderson; M A Horgan; J X Kellogg; S O McMenomey; J B Delashaw
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach.

Authors:  L Fernando Gonzalez; Neil R Crawford; Michael A Horgan; Pushpa Deshmukh; Joseph M Zabramski; Robert F Spetzler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Modified osteoplastic orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note.

Authors:  Vijayabalan Balasingam; Akio Noguchi; Sean O McMenomey; Johnny B Delashaw
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  One-piece versus two-piece orbitozygomatic craniotomy: quantitative and qualitative considerations.

Authors:  Necmettin Tanriover; Arthur J Ulm; Albert L Rhoton; Masatou Kawashima; Nobutaka Yoshioka; Stephen B Lewis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Post-operative infections of osteoplastic compared with free bone flaps.

Authors:  S Rasmussen; J K Ohrström; L Westergaard; M Kosteljanetz
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Retrograde dissection of the temporalis muscle preventing muscle atrophy for pterional craniotomy. Technical note.

Authors:  S Oikawa; M Mizuno; S Muraoka; S Kobayashi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  The supraorbital approach: technical note.

Authors:  J A Jane; T S Park; L H Pobereskin; H R Winn; A B Butler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Cranial base approaches to intracranial aneurysms in the subarachnoid space.

Authors:  L N Sekhar; K K Kalia; H Yonas; D C Wright; H Ching
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique.

Authors:  A Hakuba; S Liu; S Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1986-09

10.  Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach associated with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas.

Authors:  P Pellerin; F Lesoin; P Dhellemmes; M Donazzan; M Jomin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Craniopharyngiomas: A Primer for the Skull Base Surgeon.

Authors:  Christopher Salvatore Graffeo; Avital Perry; Michael J Link; David J Daniels
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-19

Review 2.  Developmental Considerations in Pediatric Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Melissa A LoPresti; Jonathan N Sellin; Franco DeMonte
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-05

3.  Meningiomas of the pediatric skull base: a review.

Authors:  William C Gump
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-09-21

Review 4.  A systematic review of the results of surgery and radiotherapy on tumor control for pediatric craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Aaron J Clark; Tene A Cage; Derick Aranda; Andrew T Parsa; Peter P Sun; Kurtis I Auguste; Nalin Gupta
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.