OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of 18%, 21% or 100% oxygen on the recovery of the heart and kidneys in a short-term survival model of neonatal hypoxia-reoxygenation (HR). DESIGN: Controlled, block-randomized animal study. SETTING: University animal research laboratory. SUBJECT: Large White piglets (1-3 days, 1.7-2.5 kg). INTERVENTIONS: Piglets received normocapnic hypoxia (15% oxygen) (2 h) and were reoxygenated with 18%, 21% or 100% oxygen (1 h) (n=7 per group) then 21% oxygen (2 h). Sham-operated pigs (n=7) had no HR. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Seventeen of 21 HR piglets recovered from moderate hypoxemia (mean PaO(2) 27-33 mmHg and pH 7.20-7.22, associated with tachycardia and hypotension). Systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, left renal arterial flow, oxygen transport, plasma troponin-I and creatinine levels were monitored and recovered with no differences among HR groups over 4 days after resuscitation. The 100% group had increased myocardial oxidative stress (oxidized glutathione levels) and the most cardiac HR-induced injury. There were no differences in renal oxidative stress and HR-induced injury among groups. Early oxygenation at 1 h after resuscitation correlated with the plasma troponin-I level at 6 h (r = -0.51 and 0.64 for SaO(2) and systemic oxygen extraction ratio, p<0.05, respectively) and renal HR-induced injury at 4 days (r =0.61 for renal oxygen delivery, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxic piglets, 18%, 21% and 100% reoxygenation caused similar systemic and renal hemodynamic and functional recovery. The indicators of oxidative stress and HR injury in myocardial and renal tissues suggest that the reoxygenation with 100% oxygen appears sub-optimal and the use of 18% oxygen offers no further benefit, when compared with 21% oxygen.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of 18%, 21% or 100% oxygen on the recovery of the heart and kidneys in a short-term survival model of neonatal hypoxia-reoxygenation (HR). DESIGN: Controlled, block-randomized animal study. SETTING: University animal research laboratory. SUBJECT: Large White piglets (1-3 days, 1.7-2.5 kg). INTERVENTIONS: Piglets received normocapnic hypoxia (15% oxygen) (2 h) and were reoxygenated with 18%, 21% or 100% oxygen (1 h) (n=7 per group) then 21% oxygen (2 h). Sham-operated pigs (n=7) had no HR. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Seventeen of 21 HR piglets recovered from moderate hypoxemia (mean PaO(2) 27-33 mmHg and pH 7.20-7.22, associated with tachycardia and hypotension). Systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, left renal arterial flow, oxygen transport, plasma troponin-I and creatinine levels were monitored and recovered with no differences among HR groups over 4 days after resuscitation. The 100% group had increased myocardial oxidative stress (oxidized glutathione levels) and the most cardiac HR-induced injury. There were no differences in renal oxidative stress and HR-induced injury among groups. Early oxygenation at 1 h after resuscitation correlated with the plasma troponin-I level at 6 h (r = -0.51 and 0.64 for SaO(2) and systemic oxygen extraction ratio, p<0.05, respectively) and renal HR-induced injury at 4 days (r =0.61 for renal oxygen delivery, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In hypoxic piglets, 18%, 21% and 100% reoxygenation caused similar systemic and renal hemodynamic and functional recovery. The indicators of oxidative stress and HR injury in myocardial and renal tissues suggest that the reoxygenation with 100% oxygen appears sub-optimal and the use of 18% oxygen offers no further benefit, when compared with 21% oxygen.
Authors: Berit Holthe Munkeby; Wenche Bakken Børke; Kristin Bjørnland; Liv Ingunn B Sikkeland; Grethe Iren A Borge; Jon Lømo; Santiago Rivera; Michel Khrestchatisky; Bente Halvorsen; Ola Didrik Saugstad Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Amy L Presti; Sergei V Kishkurno; Siarhei K Slinko; Tara M Randis; Veniamin I Ratner; Richard A Polin; Vadim S Ten Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: W B Borke; B H Munkeby; B Halvorsen; K Bjornland; S H Tunheim; G I A Borge; E Thaulow; O D Saugstad Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.686
Authors: Erika Haase; David L Bigam; Quentin B Nakonechny; Laurence D Jewell; Gregory Korbutt; Po-Yin Cheung Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Berit H Munkeby; Wenche B Børke; Kristin Bjørnland; Liv I B Sikkeland; Grethe I A Borge; Bente Halvorsen; Ola D Saugstad Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2004-09-03 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Ola D Saugstad; Siddarth Ramji; Simin F Irani; Safaa El-Meneza; Emil A Hernandez; Maximo Vento; Tiina Talvik; Rønnaug Solberg; Terje Rootwelt; Odd O Aalen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Steffen Schulz; Sina Reulecke; Michael Eiselt; Karin Schwab; Herbert Witte; Bernd Walter; Reinhard Bauer; Andreas Voss Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 17.440