Literature DB >> 18235421

Oncologic PET tracers beyond [(18)F]FDG and the novel quantitative approaches in PET imaging.

R Kumar1, H Dhanpathi, S Basu, D Rubello, S Fanti, A Alavi.   

Abstract

In this review, we focus on the oncological applications of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers other than [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and the novel quantitative approaches in PET imaging. Oncological non-FDG PET tracers can be broadly categorized into 3 groups: those labeled with (18)F, (11)C and other non-FDG tracers. Fluorine-18 and (11)C are labeled with different amino acids, substrates involved in fatty acid synthesis, protein synthesis, amino acid transport substrate and tracers linked to nucleic acid synthesis. These tracers are also labeled with specific ligands for receptor imaging (i.e. estrogens, dihydrotestosterone or somatostatin). The other non-FDG radiotracers can be labeled with (68)Ga, (60)Cu, (64)Cu, etc. and are aimed to detect cell hypoxia, bone metabolism and receptor. Many of these have shown promising results in the management of various cancers where FDG has limited role. These radiotracers have more specific mechanism of uptake and is likely be investigated in the near future. In the era of fusion imaging, novel approaches for accurate quantitative analysis include partial volume correction for measured values in small lesions, dual-time point and delayed PET imaging, and global metabolic activity for assessment of various stages of disease. Major changes are likely to occur in the future that may overcome deficiencies that are associated with the current quantitative (standardized uptake value) techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18235421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  19 in total

Review 1.  Stable isotope-resolved metabolomics and applications for drug development.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Katherine Sellers; Hunter N B Moseley; Richard M Higashi; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 2.  Personalized versus evidence-based medicine with PET-based imaging.

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  In vivo imaging in cancer.

Authors:  John Condeelis; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  [Multiparametric imaging with simultaneous MRI/PET: Methodological aspects and possible clinical applications].

Authors:  S Gatidis; H Schmidt; C D Claussen; N F Schwenzer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  [Multiparametric imaging with simultaneous MR/PET. Methodological aspects and possible clinical applications].

Authors:  S Gatidis; H Schmidt; C D Claussen; N F Schwenzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function.

Authors:  David L Barbee; Ryan T Flynn; James E Holden; Robert J Nickles; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  FDG PET/CT in carcinoma of unknown primary.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Gang Cheng; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.