Alyssa Easton1, Kat Jackson, Paul Mowery, Dawn Comeau, Randall Sell. 1. Steps Program Office, Division of Adult and Community Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop K-85, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. ace7@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between smoking and romantic attractions and relationships. METHODS: We used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to assess associations of smoking at Waves I and II with same-sex, both-sex, and opposite-sex romantic attractions or relationships as determined at Wave I. We used logistic regression to predict smoking at Wave II by sexual orientation. RESULTS: Both adolescent boys and adolescent girls with both-sex attractions or relationships were significantly more likely than those with opposite-sex attractions or relationships to be current smokers. Adolescent boys and girls with both-sex attractions or relationships who were nonsmokers at Wave I were more likely to be current smokers at Wave II than those with opposite-sex attractions or relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support previous research on smoking among youths who report same-sex or both-sex romantic attractions or relationships and demonstrate the increased risk bisexual youths have for smoking initiation and smoking prevalence. Tobacco use prevention programs targeting gay and bisexual youths are warranted, particularly among adolescent girls and boys who have had both-sex romantic attractions or relationships.
OBJECTIVES: We examined cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between smoking and romantic attractions and relationships. METHODS: We used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to assess associations of smoking at Waves I and II with same-sex, both-sex, and opposite-sex romantic attractions or relationships as determined at Wave I. We used logistic regression to predict smoking at Wave II by sexual orientation. RESULTS: Both adolescent boys and adolescent girls with both-sex attractions or relationships were significantly more likely than those with opposite-sex attractions or relationships to be current smokers. Adolescent boys and girls with both-sex attractions or relationships who were nonsmokers at Wave I were more likely to be current smokers at Wave II than those with opposite-sex attractions or relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support previous research on smoking among youths who report same-sex or both-sex romantic attractions or relationships and demonstrate the increased risk bisexual youths have for smoking initiation and smoking prevalence. Tobacco use prevention programs targeting gay and bisexual youths are warranted, particularly among adolescent girls and boys who have had both-sex romantic attractions or relationships.
Authors: Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Mary L Young; Martha W Waller; Sandra L Martin; Lawrence L Kupper Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat Ziyadeh; Laurie B Fisher; Jessica A Kahn; Graham A Colditz; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-04
Authors: Hee-Jin Jun; S Bryn Austin; Sarah A Wylie; Heather L Corliss; Benita Jackson; Donna Spiegelman; Mathew J Pazaris; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-07-18 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Heather L Corliss; Brianna M Wadler; Hee-Jin Jun; Margaret Rosario; David Wypij; A Lindsay Frazier; S Bryn Austin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Margaret Rosario; Heather L Corliss; Bethany G Everett; Sari L Reisner; S Bryn Austin; Francisco O Buchting; Michelle Birkett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Margaret Rosario; Heather L Corliss; Bethany G Everett; Stephen T Russell; Francisco O Buchting; Michelle A Birkett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Rebecca Andrews; Amy Herrick; Ron Stall; Phillip W Schnarrs Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Damali N Martin; Tram Kim Lam; Katy Brignole; Kimlin T Ashing; William J Blot; Linda Burhansstipanov; Jarvis T Chen; Mark Dignan; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Maria Elena Martinez; Alicia Matthews; Julie R Palmer; Eliseo J Perez-Stable; Mario Schootman; Hugo Vilchis; Alexander Vu; Shobha Srinivasan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.254