Mohamed Dirani1, Sri N Shekar, Paul N Baird. 1. Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. m.dirani@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: Educational attainment has been proposed as one of the most consistent environmental risk factors associated with myopia. The Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study is the first myopia twin study to determine the relative genetic contribution in educational attainment as well as assessing the shared genetic and environmental factors between educational attainment and refraction through structural equation modeling. METHODS: All twins from Victoria aged 18 years or older were invited to participate in this study through the Australian Twin Registry (ATR). Each twin completed a general questionnaire, and a comprehensive eye examination was undertaken. Education level was categorized to provide a level of attainment. RESULTS: A total of 612 twin pairs with a mean age of 52.36 years were examined. Higher educational attainment was significantly associated with a more myopic refraction (r = -0.21, P < 0.01), with educational attainment explaining 4.41% of the total variance in refraction. Findings from the GEM twin study found that genes (additive genetic effects) explained 69% of the variance in educational attainment and common and unique environmental factors accounted for 20% and 11% of the variance, respectively. Of the genetic influences on refraction, 3.2% were common with those influencing educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: The GEM twin study has shown that educational attainment is strongly influenced by genes, and therefore this risk factor should not solely be considered as an environmental risk factor. The same genetic factors that influence an individual's educational attainment may also be involved in the development of refractive error.
PURPOSE: Educational attainment has been proposed as one of the most consistent environmental risk factors associated with myopia. The Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study is the first myopia twin study to determine the relative genetic contribution in educational attainment as well as assessing the shared genetic and environmental factors between educational attainment and refraction through structural equation modeling. METHODS: All twins from Victoria aged 18 years or older were invited to participate in this study through the Australian Twin Registry (ATR). Each twin completed a general questionnaire, and a comprehensive eye examination was undertaken. Education level was categorized to provide a level of attainment. RESULTS: A total of 612 twin pairs with a mean age of 52.36 years were examined. Higher educational attainment was significantly associated with a more myopic refraction (r = -0.21, P < 0.01), with educational attainment explaining 4.41% of the total variance in refraction. Findings from the GEM twin study found that genes (additive genetic effects) explained 69% of the variance in educational attainment and common and unique environmental factors accounted for 20% and 11% of the variance, respectively. Of the genetic influences on refraction, 3.2% were common with those influencing educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: The GEM twin study has shown that educational attainment is strongly influenced by genes, and therefore this risk factor should not solely be considered as an environmental risk factor. The same genetic factors that influence an individual's educational attainment may also be involved in the development of refractive error.
Authors: M Wang; J Ma; L Pan; T Chen; H L Wang; Y H Wang; W R Wang; X D Pan; Y G Qian; X Zhang; Y Zhong; G L Shan Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: A Frimpong-Boateng; F Rüfer; S Fiadoyor; J Nkrumah-Mills; F Mensah-Tetteh; N Kudoadzi; J Roider Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Yi Lu; Pik Fang Kho; Alex W Hewitt; H-Erich Wichmann; Seyhan Yazar; Dwight Stambolian; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Robert Wojciechowski; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; David A Mackey; Stuart MacGregor Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Veronique Vitart; Goran Bencić; Caroline Hayward; Jelena Skunca Herman; Jennifer Huffman; Susan Campbell; Kajo Bućan; Lina Zgaga; Ivana Kolcić; Ozren Polasek; Harry Campbell; Alan Wright; Zoran Vatavuk; Igor Rudan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jeremy A Guggenheim; Cathy Williams; Kate Northstone; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Beate St Pourcain; George McMahon; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Katie M Williams; Geir Bertelsen; Phillippa Cumberland; Christian Wolfram; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Eleftherios Anastasopoulos; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; Maja Gran Erke; Ruth Hogg; René Höhn; Pirro Hysi; Anthony P Khawaja; Jean-François Korobelnik; Janina Ried; Johannes R Vingerling; Alain Bron; Jean-François Dartigues; Astrid Fletcher; Albert Hofman; Robert W A M Kuijpers; Robert N Luben; Konrad Oxele; Fotis Topouzis; Therese von Hanno; Alireza Mirshahi; Paul J Foster; Cornelia M van Duijn; Norbert Pfeiffer; Cécile Delcourt; Caroline C W Klaver; Jugnoo Rahi; Christopher J Hammond Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Clara Martinez-Perez; Cesar Villa-Collar; Cristina Andreu-Vázquez; Alicia Ruiz-Pomeda; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390