Literature DB >> 18234713

Drosophila melanogaster prefers compounds perceived sweet by humans.

Beth Gordesky-Gold1, Natasha Rivers, Osama M Ahmed, Paul A S Breslin.   

Abstract

To understand the functional similarities of fly and mammalian taste receptors, we used a top-down approach that first established the fly sweetener-response profile. We employed the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, an omnivorous human commensal, and determined its sensitivity to an extended set of stimuli that humans find sweet. Flies were tested with all sweeteners in 2 assays that measured their taste reactivity (proboscis extension assay) and their ingestive preferences (free roaming ingestion choice test). A total of 21 sweeteners, comprised of 11 high-potency sweeteners, 2 amino acids, 5 sugars, 2 sugar alcohols, and a sweet salt (PbCl2), were tested in both assays. We found that wild-type Drosophila responded appetitively to most high-potency sweeteners preferred by humans, even those not considered sweet by rodents or new world monkeys. The similarities in taste preferences for sweeteners suggest that frugivorous/omnivorous apes and flies have evolved promiscuous carbohydrate taste detectors with similar affinities for myriad high-potency sweeteners. Whether these perceptual parallels are the result of convergent evolution of saccharide receptor-binding mechanisms remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234713     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  23 in total

1.  Evolutionary differences in food preference rely on Gr64e, a receptor for glycerol.

Authors:  Zev Wisotsky; Adriana Medina; Erica Freeman; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Biting off more than you can chew: sexual selection on the free amino acid composition of the spermatophylax in decorated crickets.

Authors:  Susan N Gershman; Christopher Mitchell; Scott K Sakaluk; John Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Peripheral coding of taste.

Authors:  Emily R Liman; Yali V Zhang; Craig Montell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Gustatory processing and taste memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Alex C Keene
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.250

5.  Taste-independent detection of the caloric content of sugar in Drosophila.

Authors:  Monica Dus; SooHong Min; Alex C Keene; Ga Young Lee; Greg S B Suh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species.

Authors:  Xia Li; Alexander A Bachmanov; Kenji Maehashi; Weihua Li; Raymond Lim; Joseph G Brand; Gary K Beauchamp; Danielle R Reed; Chloe Thai; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Ethanol preference in Drosophila melanogaster is driven by its caloric value.

Authors:  Jascha B Pohl; Brett A Baldwin; Boingoc L Dinh; Pinkey Rahman; Dustin Smerek; Francisco J Prado; Nyssa Sherazee; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Transduction mechanism(s) of Na-saccharin in the blowfly Protophormia terraenovae: evidence for potassium and calcium conductance involvement.

Authors:  Carla Masala; Paolo Solari; Giorgia Sollai; Roberto Crnjar; Anna Liscia
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Optimizing oral medications for children.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Detection of sweet tastants by a conserved group of insect gustatory receptors.

Authors:  Erica Gene Freeman; Zev Wisotsky; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.