INTRODUCTION: Clival chordomas have traditionally been removed using a variety of anterior and lateral skull base approaches. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent an extended endonasal transsphenoidal removal of a clival chordoma. METHOD: All consecutive patients with a clival chordoma treated using an endonasal microscope approach were identified. In 8 cases, frameless surgical navigation was used, and in 4 cases, endoscopic assistance was used. Patients treated with prior radiotherapy were excluded. RESULT: Over 5 years, 18 procedures were performed on 14 patients (7 females; mean age, 47 years). Patients were followed from 3 to 58 months (median, 20 months). Mean tumor diameter was 32 +/- 17 mm; 7 (50%) patients had intradural extension. Postoperative MRIs after the initial operation showed gross total, near-total (>90%), and subtotal resection in 43%, 43%, and 14% of patients, respectively. Use of the endoscope was associated with gross total or near-total tumor removal in 4 of 4 cases. Tumor regrowth occurred in 2 (14%) cases 10 and 12 months after the initial surgery and before radiotherapy. Two patients had multiple operations, in one as a planned staged operation, and in the other, 3 additional debulkings were performed despite an initial gross total removal. Nine patients, all with CS invasion, had subsequent stereotactic radiation. Of 10 patients with cranial neuropathy, 80% improved or resolved including 75% and 67% of sixth and fifth CN palsies, respectively. Complications included one each of adrenal insufficiency and chemical meningitis. There were no CSF leaks or new neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: In this small series with relatively short follow-up, endonasal microscopic removal of clival chordomas proved safe and elfective with gross total or near-total removal in 86% of patients and improvement of cranial neuropathy in 80% of patients. Endoscopy for aiding tumor removal and assessing completeness of resection, as well as surgical navigation, are recommended for all cases.
INTRODUCTION:Clival chordomas have traditionally been removed using a variety of anterior and lateral skull base approaches. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent an extended endonasal transsphenoidal removal of a clival chordoma. METHOD: All consecutive patients with a clival chordoma treated using an endonasal microscope approach were identified. In 8 cases, frameless surgical navigation was used, and in 4 cases, endoscopic assistance was used. Patients treated with prior radiotherapy were excluded. RESULT: Over 5 years, 18 procedures were performed on 14 patients (7 females; mean age, 47 years). Patients were followed from 3 to 58 months (median, 20 months). Mean tumor diameter was 32 +/- 17 mm; 7 (50%) patients had intradural extension. Postoperative MRIs after the initial operation showed gross total, near-total (>90%), and subtotal resection in 43%, 43%, and 14% of patients, respectively. Use of the endoscope was associated with gross total or near-total tumor removal in 4 of 4 cases. Tumor regrowth occurred in 2 (14%) cases 10 and 12 months after the initial surgery and before radiotherapy. Two patients had multiple operations, in one as a planned staged operation, and in the other, 3 additional debulkings were performed despite an initial gross total removal. Nine patients, all with CS invasion, had subsequent stereotactic radiation. Of 10 patients with cranial neuropathy, 80% improved or resolved including 75% and 67% of sixth and fifth CN palsies, respectively. Complications included one each of adrenal insufficiency and chemical meningitis. There were no CSF leaks or new neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: In this small series with relatively short follow-up, endonasal microscopic removal of clival chordomas proved safe and elfective with gross total or near-total removal in 86% of patients and improvement of cranial neuropathy in 80% of patients. Endoscopy for aiding tumor removal and assessing completeness of resection, as well as surgical navigation, are recommended for all cases.
Authors: Francesco Belotti; Francesco Tengattini; Davide Mattavelli; Marco Ferrari; Antonio Fiorentino; Silvia Agnelli; Alberto Schreiber; Piero Nicolai; Marco Maria Fontanella; Francesco Doglietto Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Navjot Chaudhary; Amanda Hu; Brian W Rotenberg; Neil Duggal; Christopher J Howlett; Robert R Hammond; Lorne Parnes; Steve P Lownie Journal: Skull Base Date: 2010-09
Authors: Moran Amit; Shorook Na'ara; Yoav Binenbaum; Salem Billan; Gil Sviri; Jacob T Cohen; Ziv Gil Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2014-05-27