BACKGROUND: The relation between postinfarction left ventricle remodeling (LVR), autonomic nervous system and repolarization process is unclear. Purpose of the study was to assess the influence of LVR on the early (QTpeak) and late (TpeakTend) repolarization periods in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) treated with primary PCI. The day-to-night differences of repolarization parameters and the relation between QT and heart rate variability (HRV) indices, as well left ventricle function were also assessed. METHODS: The study cohort of 104 pts was examined 6 months after acute MI. HRV and QT indices (corrected to the heart rate) were obtained from the entire 24-hour Holter recording, daytime and nighttime periods. RESULTS: LVR was found in 33 patients (31.7%). The study groups (LVR+ vs LVR-) did not differ in age, the extent of coronary artery lesions and treatment. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower (38%+/- 11% vs 55%+/- 11%, P < 0.001), both QTc (443 +/- 26 ms vs 420 +/- 20 ms, P < 0.001) and TpeakTendc (98 +/- 11 ms vs 84 +/- 12 ms, P < 0.005) were longer in LVR + patients, with no differences for QTpeakc. Trends toward lower values of time-domain (SDRR, rMSSD) HRV parameters were found in LVR+ pts. Day-to-night difference was observed only for SDRR, more marked in LVR-group. Remarkable relations between delta LVEF (6 months minus baseline), delta LVEDV and TpeakTendc were found, with no such relationships for QTpeakc. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with LVR have longer repolarization time, especially the late phase-TpeakTend, which represents transmural dispersion of repolarization. Its prolongation seems to be related to local attributes of myocardium and global function of the left ventricle but unrelated to the autonomic nervous influences. Remodeling with moderate LV systolic dysfunction is associated with insignificant decrease in HRV indices and preserved circadian variability.
BACKGROUND: The relation between postinfarction left ventricle remodeling (LVR), autonomic nervous system and repolarization process is unclear. Purpose of the study was to assess the influence of LVR on the early (QTpeak) and late (TpeakTend) repolarization periods in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) treated with primary PCI. The day-to-night differences of repolarization parameters and the relation between QT and heart rate variability (HRV) indices, as well left ventricle function were also assessed. METHODS: The study cohort of 104 pts was examined 6 months after acute MI. HRV and QT indices (corrected to the heart rate) were obtained from the entire 24-hour Holter recording, daytime and nighttime periods. RESULTS: LVR was found in 33 patients (31.7%). The study groups (LVR+ vs LVR-) did not differ in age, the extent of coronary artery lesions and treatment. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower (38%+/- 11% vs 55%+/- 11%, P < 0.001), both QTc (443 +/- 26 ms vs 420 +/- 20 ms, P < 0.001) and TpeakTendc (98 +/- 11 ms vs 84 +/- 12 ms, P < 0.005) were longer in LVR + patients, with no differences for QTpeakc. Trends toward lower values of time-domain (SDRR, rMSSD) HRV parameters were found in LVR+ pts. Day-to-night difference was observed only for SDRR, more marked in LVR-group. Remarkable relations between delta LVEF (6 months minus baseline), delta LVEDV and TpeakTendc were found, with no such relationships for QTpeakc. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with LVR have longer repolarization time, especially the late phase-TpeakTend, which represents transmural dispersion of repolarization. Its prolongation seems to be related to local attributes of myocardium and global function of the left ventricle but unrelated to the autonomic nervous influences. Remodeling with moderate LV systolic dysfunction is associated with insignificant decrease in HRV indices and preserved circadian variability.
Authors: Leonardo Bolognese; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Guido Parodi; Giampaolo Cerisano; Piergiovanni Buonamici; Giovanni M Santoro; David Antoniucci Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Krystian Wita; Artur Filipecki; Agnieszka Drzewiecka-Gerber; Maciej Turski; Anna Rybicka-Musialik; Zbigniew Tabor; Mariola Nowak; Wojciech Wróbel; Jolanta Krauze; Jan Szczogiel; Maria Trusz-Gluza Journal: Kardiol Pol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.108
Authors: Marcus V Simões; Petra Barthel; Ichiro Matsunari; Stephan G Nekolla; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger; Georg Schmidt; Frank M Bengel Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 29.983