Literature DB >> 18233682

Numerical study of the effect of the noseleaf on biosonar beamforming in a horseshoe bat.

Qiao Zhuang1, Rolf Müller.   

Abstract

Around 300 bat species are known to emit their ultrasonic biosonar pulses through the nostrils. This nasal emission coincides with the presence of intricately shaped baffle structures surrounding the nostrils. Some prior experimental evidence indicates that these "noseleaves" have an effect on the shape of the animals' radiation patterns. Here, we present a numerical acoustical analysis of the noseleaf of a horseshoe bat species. We show that all three distinctive parts of its noseleaf ("lancet," "sella," "anterior leaf") have an effect on the acoustic near field as well as on the directivity pattern. Furthermore, we show that furrows in one of the parts (the lancet) also exert such an influence. The underlying physical mechanisms suggested by the properties of the estimated near field are cavity resonance, as well as reflection and shadowing of the sound waves emitted by the nostrils. In their effects on the near field, the noseleaf parts showed a tendency toward spatial partitioning with the effects due to each part dominating a certain region. However, interactions between the acoustic effects of the parts were also evident, most notably, a synergism between two frequency-dependent effects (cavity resonance and shadowing) to produce an even stronger frequency selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18233682     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.051902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  8 in total

1.  The furrows of Rhinolophidae revisited.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Reijniers Jonas; Peremans Herbert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Morphological correlates of echolocation frequency in the endemic Cape horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus capensis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae).

Authors:  Lizelle J Odendaal; David S Jacobs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lancet dynamics in greater horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.

Authors:  Weikai He; Scott C Pedersen; Anupam K Gupta; James A Simmons; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Accelerated In-utero Development of a Sensory Apparatus in Echolocating Bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Smadar Tal; Arjan Boonman; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Noseleaf dynamics during pulse emission in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Lin Feng; Li Gao; Hongwang Lu; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Species-specific control of acoustic gaze by echolocating bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon and Pipistrellus abramus, during flight.

Authors:  Yasufumi Yamada; Shizuko Hiryu; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.