Literature DB >> 18232726

A randomized, double-blind comparison of clozapine and high-dose olanzapine in treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia.

Herbert Y Meltzer1, William V Bobo, Ajanta Roy, Karu Jayathilake, Yuejin Chen, Aygun Ertugrul, A Elif Anil Yağcioğlu, Joyce G Small.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clozapine, despite its side-effect burden, has been considered to be the drug of choice for patients with schizophrenia whose psychotic symptoms fail to respond adequately to other anti-psychotic drugs. There are conflicting data concerning the potential utility of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia at doses beyond the 10- to 20-mg/day range that has proven to be effective for most nonrefractory patients with schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (target dose, 25-45 mg/day) and clozapine (300-900 mg/day) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had failed to respond adequately to prior treatment with other antipsychotic drugs. STUDY DESIGN/
METHOD: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (mean dose, 34 mg/day; N = 19) or clozapine (mean dose, 564 mg/day; N = 21) in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Outcome measures included psychopathology, cognitive performance (as assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery), and tolerability. The study was conducted between May 2000 and December 2003.
RESULTS: Robust and significant (mostly p < .001) improvement in multiple measures of psychopathology, mainly between 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment, was found in both treatment groups, with no significant difference between the 2 treatments except for the Global Assessment of Functioning score, which favored clozapine (p = .01). Improvement in some domains of cognition was significant-and equivalent for both drugs, as well. Nonsignificantly different improvement in Verbal List Learning-Immediate Recall (p < .05), Controlled Word Association Test (p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (p < .001) was found. There were no significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms. Weight gain was significantly (p = .01) greater with olanzapine.
CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine, at higher than customary doses, demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in this study. However, the small sample size precludes definitively concluding that the 2 treatments are equivalent, at these doses, in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are a limitation in its use. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00179231.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18232726     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  30 in total

1.  Blinding in clozapine trials: a problem and a potential solution.

Authors:  Tamar Wohlfarth; Don Linszen; Wim Van Den Brink
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Does a history of suicide attempt predict higher antipsychotic dosage in schizophrenia?

Authors:  Nuwan C Hettige; James L Kennedy; Vincenzo De Luca
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  High-dose olanzapine for bipolar depression: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Vidya Perera; Alan Forrest; Junzhe Xu
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-10-23

4.  Long-term effectiveness of oral second-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct head-to-head comparisons.

Authors:  Taishiro Kishimoto; Katsuhiko Hagi; Masahiro Nitta; John M Kane; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Combination and high-dose atypical antipsychotic therapy in patients with schizophrenia: systematic review.

Authors: 
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 6.  The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements.

Authors:  Robert W Buchanan; Julie Kreyenbuhl; Deanna L Kelly; Jason M Noel; Douglas L Boggs; Bernard A Fischer; Seth Himelhoch; Beverly Fang; Eunice Peterson; Patrick R Aquino; William Keller
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Comparative effectiveness research for antipsychotic medications: how much is enough?

Authors:  David O Meltzer; Anirban Basu; Herbert Y Meltzer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Current perspectives in the treatment of resistant schizophrenia.

Authors:  R K Solanki; Paramjeet Singh; Deepti Munshi
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  A genome-wide investigation of SNPs and CNVs in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anna C Need; Dongliang Ge; Michael E Weale; Jessica Maia; Sheng Feng; Erin L Heinzen; Kevin V Shianna; Woohyun Yoon; Dalia Kasperaviciūte; Massimo Gennarelli; Warren J Strittmatter; Cristian Bonvicini; Giuseppe Rossi; Karu Jayathilake; Philip A Cola; Joseph P McEvoy; Richard S E Keefe; Elizabeth M C Fisher; Pamela L St Jean; Ina Giegling; Annette M Hartmann; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Andreas Ruppert; Gillian Fraser; Caroline Crombie; Lefkos T Middleton; David St Clair; Allen D Roses; Pierandrea Muglia; Clyde Francks; Dan Rujescu; Herbert Y Meltzer; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Asenapine monotherapy in the acute treatment of both schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Delia Bishara; David Taylor
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.