| Literature DB >> 18231595 |
Paolo Monaci1, Alessandra Luzzago, Claudia Santini, Alessandra De Pra, Mirko Arcuri, Francesca Magistri, Alessandro Bellini, Helenia Ansuini, Maria Ambrosio, Virginia Ammendola, Maria Giulia Bigotti, Agostino Cirillo, Maurizio Nuzzo, Annamaria Assunta Nasti, Philippe Neuner, Laura Orsatti, Monica Pezzanera, Andrea Sbardellati, Giuseppe Silvestre, Paolo Uva, Valentina Viti, Gaetano Barbato, Stefano Colloca, Anna Demartis, Emanuele De Rinaldis, Saverio Giampaoli, Armin Lahm, Fabio Palombo, Fabio Talamo, Alessandra Vitelli, Alfredo Nicosia, Riccardo Cortese.
Abstract
A novel and efficient tagArray technology was developed that allows rapid identification of antibodies which bind to receptors with a specific expression profile, in the absence of biological information. This method is based on the cloning of a specific, short nucleotide sequence (tag) in the phagemid coding for each phage-displayed antibody fragment (phage-Ab) present in a library. In order to set up and validate the method we identified about 10,000 different phage-Abs binding to receptors expressed in their native form on the cell surface (10 k Membranome collection) and tagged each individual phage-Ab. The frequency of each phage-Ab in a given population can at this point be inferred by measuring the frequency of its associated tag sequence through standard DNA hybridization methods. Using tiny amounts of biological samples we identified phage-Abs binding to receptors preferentially expressed on primary tumor cells rather than on cells obtained from matched normal tissues. These antibodies inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and tumor development in vivo, thus representing therapeutic lead candidates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18231595 PMCID: PMC2204054 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Strategy adopted to generate the 10k Membranome phage-Ab collection
Figure 2Workflow of the tagArray screening procedure employed to identify tumor-specific phage-Abs.
Figure 3Binding specificity of selected clones.
Binding of phage-Ab HL60-D3-232, HeLa-D2-20, HL60-C3-16 and a control phage-Ab (a) or of Mbr-4 and a control isotypic IgG (Mbr-ctrl; b) to human epithelial primary cells was measured by flow cytometry. Primary cells were obtained from matched tumor and adjacent normal tissue from CRC patients #78 (white and dark grey bars, respectively) and #80 (pale grey and black bars, respectively). Data are reported as percentage of gated cells. In panel a, numbers on top of tumor sample bars refer to the difference of percentage between that tumor and the matched normal sample (top line) and to the T/N ratio detected by tagArray analysis for the corresponding tags (bottom line).
Figure 4Schematic outline of the biochemical strategy adopted for the identification of the target antigens.
Membrane proteins on living cells are selectively labeled with fluorescent dyes (i), then isolated in native conformation and in soluble form by extraction with appropriate buffers (ii). The target antigen is pulled down using the beads-immobilized IgG of interest (iii). Immuno-purified material is analyzed by 1D-PAGE and membrane proteins discriminated from non-specific binders by dual-wavelength scan of the gel (iv). Positive band is excised and processed for MS-based protein identification.
Figure 5In vitro characterization of anti-TfRC Mbr-4.
(a) The indicated cell lines were incubated for 72 hrs at 37°C with 100 µg/mL of Mbr-2, Mbr-4, Mbr-114 or an isotypic control. Cell viability is reported as percentage of the isotopic control treated cells. (b) HCT-116 cells were incubated for 48, 72 and 96 hrs with 0.8 (•), 4 (▪) and 20 (▴) µg/mL of Mbr-4 or with an isotypic control (○). Cell apoptosis is reported as percentage of Annexin V-, 7AAD-positive cells.
Figure 6In vivo anti-tumoral activity of anti-TfRC Mbr-4.
BALB/c nude mice were challenged with a subcutaneous injection of HCT-116 cells at day = 0. A first group of mice (filled triangles; n = 12) was administered with 10 i.p. injections of 0.5 mg IgG-4 three times a week starting from day = 0. Mice from this group were followed up to day = 64. A second group of mice (empty circles, n = 12) was administered injections of control isotypic IgG according to the same protocol and followed up to day = 35, when mice were sacrificed for ethical reasons. Both groups were monitored for tumor growth expressed as percentage of free mice (panel a) and tumor volume (b). Error bars in panel b indicate standard error of the mean (S.E.M).