Thomas E Hamilton1, Scott Davis, Lynn Onstad, Kenneth J Kopecky. 1. Program in Epidermology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. tehamilton@aol.com
Abstract
CONTEXT: The current debate regarding whether to decrease the upper limit for the TSH reference range to 2.5 microIU/ml has considerable potential impact on the diagnosis and treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism worldwide. OBJECTIVE: We report an analysis of TSH distribution in a population with no evidence of thyroid disease, including a normal thyroid ultrasound. DESIGN: A subset of the Hanford Thyroid Disease Study cohort was used to examine the TSH distribution in a population having no evidence of thyroid disease, seronegative thyroid autoantibodies, no history of thyroid medications, and a normal thyroid ultrasound. The shape of the TSH distribution was compared with the Gaussian and lognormal distributions. SETTING: This study was performed in the general community. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1861 Hanford Thyroid Disease Study participants with TSH measured by ELISA who also had thyroid peroxidase antibody measurements, 766 comprised the normal reference group 3 (NRG-3) with no evidence of thyroid disease, including no positive antibodies and normal thyroid ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: TSH was measured. RESULTS: The TSH distribution in the NRG (NRG-3) was right skewed and followed an approximate lognormal distribution. The best estimates of the 97.5th percentile, the percentage above 2.5 microIU/ml, and the percentage above 3.0 microIU/ml for TSH by 3rd generation immunochemiluminometric assay are 4.1 microIU/ml, 20% and 10.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the TSH reference range should be narrowed and support a value of approximately 4.0 as the upper-reference limit.
CONTEXT: The current debate regarding whether to decrease the upper limit for the TSH reference range to 2.5 microIU/ml has considerable potential impact on the diagnosis and treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism worldwide. OBJECTIVE: We report an analysis of TSH distribution in a population with no evidence of thyroid disease, including a normal thyroid ultrasound. DESIGN: A subset of the Hanford Thyroid Disease Study cohort was used to examine the TSH distribution in a population having no evidence of thyroid disease, seronegative thyroid autoantibodies, no history of thyroid medications, and a normal thyroid ultrasound. The shape of the TSH distribution was compared with the Gaussian and lognormal distributions. SETTING: This study was performed in the general community. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1861 Hanford Thyroid Disease Study participants with TSH measured by ELISA who also had thyroid peroxidase antibody measurements, 766 comprised the normal reference group 3 (NRG-3) with no evidence of thyroid disease, including no positive antibodies and normal thyroid ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: TSH was measured. RESULTS: The TSH distribution in the NRG (NRG-3) was right skewed and followed an approximate lognormal distribution. The best estimates of the 97.5th percentile, the percentage above 2.5 microIU/ml, and the percentage above 3.0 microIU/ml for TSH by 3rd generation immunochemiluminometric assay are 4.1 microIU/ml, 20% and 10.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the TSH reference range should be narrowed and support a value of approximately 4.0 as the upper-reference limit.
Authors: Zubair Baloch; Pierre Carayon; Bernard Conte-Devolx; Laurence M Demers; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Jean-François Henry; Virginia A LiVosli; Patricia Niccoli-Sire; Rhys John; Jean Ruf; Peter P A Smyth; Carole A Spencer; Jan R Stockigt Journal: Thyroid Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Joseph G Hollowell; Norman W Staehling; W Dana Flanders; W Harry Hannon; Elaine W Gunter; Carole A Spencer; Lewis E Braverman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Martin I Surks; Eduardo Ortiz; Gilbert H Daniels; Clark T Sawin; Nananda F Col; Rhoda H Cobin; Jayne A Franklyn; Jerome M Hershman; Kenneth D Burman; Margo A Denke; Colum Gorman; Richard S Cooper; Neil J Weissman Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mijin Kim; Tae Yong Kim; Soo Han Kim; Yunkyoung Lee; Su-yeon Park; Hyung-Don Kim; Hyemi Kwon; Yun Mi Choi; Eun Kyung Jang; Min Ji Jeon; Won Gu Kim; Young Kee Shong; Won Bae Kim Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.884