| Literature DB >> 18230581 |
Abstract
The contribution of breast MR imaging for second intention after a complete assessment (mammography, ultra-sound, and possibly histological) of breast pathology is not any more to show. Its limits are due primarily to its great sensitivity responsible for false positive (20 to 40 %) and to the difficulty in carrying out biopsies under guidance IRM of the lesions not found in second intention by the mammography and ultrasound (50 to 75 %). Its use reasoned by respecting the indications recognized as useful and validated for the clinical plan is an imperative condition to avoid noxious assumptions of responsibility of the patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18230581 DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Cancer ISSN: 0007-4551 Impact factor: 1.276