Literature DB >> 18228455

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH).

Jane Bayani1, Jeremy A Squire.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) involves the preparation of two main components: the DNA probe and the target DNA to which the probe will be hybridized. The DNA probe typically comes from cloned sources such as plasmids, cosmids, PACs, YACs, or BACs; where the insert may contain a specific gene or originate from a specific chromosomal locus. Whole-chromosome paints may also be used but are usually applicable to metaphase preparations. The purified DNA can then be labeled and detected indirectly using haptens, or labeled directly using fluorochrome or dye-conjugated nucleotides. Labeling strategies are also variable, employing standard nick translation or PCR labeling methods. The target DNA can take the form of chromosomes spreads or interphase nuclei. The sources of interphase targets may come from cytogenetic preparations or from paraffin-embedded tissues. Both the labeled DNA probe and DNA target are denatured to a single-stranded state and permitted to hybridize to each other. Post-hybridization washes and fluorescently-labeled antibody incubations follow the 24-hour hybridization, and the specimen is ready for visualization by fluorescent microscopy. Successful interpretation of FISH experiments is dependent on the quality of the starting materials, hybridization efficiencies, and stringency of post-hybridization washes and antibody detections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 18228455     DOI: 10.1002/0471143030.cb2204s23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol        ISSN: 1934-2616


  18 in total

1.  A common molecular mechanism underlies two phenotypically distinct 17p13.1 microdeletion syndromes.

Authors:  Adam Shlien; Berivan Baskin; Maria Isabel W Achatz; Dimitrios J Stavropoulos; Kim E Nichols; Louanne Hudgins; Chantal F Morel; Margaret P Adam; Nataliya Zhukova; Lianne Rotin; Ana Novokmet; Harriet Druker; Mary Shago; Peter N Ray; Pierre Hainaut; David Malkin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Recombination between inverted loxP sites is cytotoxic for proliferating cells and provides a simple tool for conditional cell ablation.

Authors:  Damien Grégoire; Marie Kmita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Macrophages Characterization in an Injured Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Krisztina Nikovics; Marjorie Durand; Cédric Castellarin; Julien Burger; Emma Sicherre; Jean-Marc Collombet; Myriam Oger; Xavier Holy; Anne-Laure Favier
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-11

Review 4.  A guide for single-particle chromatin tracking in live cell nuclei.

Authors:  Mengdi Zhang; Clayton Seitz; Garrick Chang; Fadil Iqbal; Hua Lin; Jing Liu
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.473

5.  Image cytometry-based detection of aneuploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridization in suspension.

Authors:  Hans Minderman; Kristen Humphrey; Jane K Arcadi; Andrzej Wierzbicki; Orla Maguire; Eunice S Wang; AnneMarie W Block; Sheila N J Sait; Thaddeus C George; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  CytoGPS: A large-scale karyotype analysis of CML data.

Authors:  Zachary B Abrams; Suli Li; Lin Zhang; Caitlin E Coombes; Philip R O Payne; Nyla A Heerema; Lynne V Abruzzo; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  The ploidy conveyor of mature hepatocytes as a source of genetic variation.

Authors:  Andrew W Duncan; Matthew H Taylor; Raymond D Hickey; Amy E Hanlon Newell; Michelle L Lenzi; Susan B Olson; Milton J Finegold; Markus Grompe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  mRNALocater: Enhance the prediction accuracy of eukaryotic mRNA subcellular localization by using model fusion strategy.

Authors:  Qiang Tang; Fulei Nie; Juanjuan Kang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  Overexpression of the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH10 causes chromosome missegregation and tumor formation.

Authors:  Janine H van Ree; Karthik B Jeganathan; Liviu Malureanu; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Quantitative biology of single neurons.

Authors:  James Eberwine; Ditte Lovatt; Peter Buckley; Hannah Dueck; Chantal Francis; Tae Kyung Kim; Jaehee Lee; Miler Lee; Kevin Miyashiro; Jacqueline Morris; Tiina Peritz; Terri Schochet; Jennifer Spaethling; Jai-Yoon Sul; Junhyong Kim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.