Literature DB >> 18228124

An assessment of the relationship between condom labels and HIV-related beliefs and intentions.

Amy Bleakley1, Martin Fishbein, David Holtgrave.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the impact of the FDA's proposed condom package labeling on HIV-related beliefs about condom effectiveness, on intentions to recommend condoms for friends to use, and intentions to use condoms. Using a nationally representative survey we randomized 1,194 adults ages 18-65 years into one of three condom label conditions: the current label on condom packaging; a label with the proposed FDA language; and a label with CDC language on condom effectiveness. In short, there are no significant differences between the proposed FDA label and the current label on HIV-related beliefs and intentions. In contrast, from an HIV prevention perspective, the CDC condom language appears to offer a better alternative to the current condom label for unmarried populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18228124      PMCID: PMC2849306          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-007-9353-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  9 in total

1.  Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Albarracín; B T Johnson; M Fishbein; P A Muellerleile
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control. The World Bank.

Authors: 
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The alcohol warning and adolescents: 5-year effects.

Authors:  D P MacKinnon; L Nohre; M A Pentz; A W Stacy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Overview of the sampling design and statistical methods used in the National Immunization Survey.

Authors:  P J Smith; M P Battaglia; V J Huggins; D C Hoaglin; A Rodén; M Khare; T M Ezzati-Rice; R A Wright
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; A McNeill; R Borland; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Sheeran; C Abraham; S Orbell
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Do cigarette warning labels reduce smoking? Paradoxical effects among adolescents.

Authors:  T N Robinson; J D Killen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1997-03

9.  Effects of warning and information labels on consumption of full-fat, reduced-fat, and no-fat products.

Authors:  B J Bushman
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1998-02
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Safe-sex belief and sexual risk behaviours among adolescents from three developing countries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alfonso Osorio; Cristina Lopez-del Burgo; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Silvia Carlos; Jokin de Irala
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.